Pallanti Stefano, Hollander Eric
Strategic Center of Excellence of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
CNS Spectr. 2008 Sep;13(9 Suppl 14):6-15. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900026882.
As a result of clinical, epidemiological, neuroimaging, and therapy studies that took place in the late 1980s, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been well-characterized in the field of anxiety disorders. Other disorders attracted attention for their similarities to OCD, and were located in the orbit of the disorder. OCD has become known as the "primary domain" of a scientific "metaphor" comprising the putative cluster of OCD-related disorders (OCRDs). It is a "paradigm" with which to explore basal ganglia dysfunction. The OCRDs share common phenomenology, comorbidities, lifetime course, demographics, possible genetics, and frontostriatal dysfunction (particularly caudate hyperactivity.) The adoption of this metaphor analogy has proven useful. However, 15 years since its emergence, the spectrum of obsessive-compulsive disorders remains controversial. Questions under debate include whether OCD is a unitary or split condition, whether it is an anxiety disorder, and whether there exists only one spectrum or several possible spectrums. Further work is needed to clarify obsessive-compulsive symptoms, subtypes, and endophenotypes. There is need to integrate existing databases, better define associated symptom domains, and create a more comprehensive endophenotyping protocol for OCRDs. There is also a need to integrate biological and psychological perspectives, concepts, and data to drive this evolution. By increasing research in this field, the OCD spectrum may evolve from a fragmented level of conceptualization as a "metaphor" to one that is more comprehensive and structured.
由于20世纪80年代末开展的临床、流行病学、神经影像学及治疗研究,强迫症(OCD)在焦虑症领域已得到充分描述。其他一些疾病因其与强迫症相似而受到关注,并被纳入该疾病的范畴。强迫症已成为一个科学“隐喻”的“主要领域”,该隐喻包含了假定的与强迫症相关的疾病群(OCRDs)。它是一种用于探索基底神经节功能障碍的“范式”。OCRDs具有共同的现象学、共病情况、终生病程、人口统计学特征、可能的遗传学特征以及额纹状体功能障碍(尤其是尾状核活动亢进)。事实证明,采用这种隐喻类比是有用的。然而,自其出现15年以来,强迫症谱系仍存在争议。争论的问题包括强迫症是单一还是分裂的病症、它是否属于焦虑症,以及是否只存在一种谱系还是有几种可能的谱系。需要进一步开展工作以阐明强迫症状、亚型及内表型。有必要整合现有数据库,更好地界定相关症状领域,并为OCRDs创建一个更全面的内表型分析方案。还需要整合生物学和心理学的观点、概念及数据以推动这一演变。通过增加该领域的研究,强迫症谱系可能会从作为“隐喻”的碎片化概念化水平演变为更全面、更结构化的水平。