Sharma Abhishek, Li Liping, Song Yue, Choi Kai, Lam Dennis S C, Zhang Mingzhi, Zheng Mingwei, Zhou Zhongxia, Liu Xiaojian, Wu Bin, Congdon Nathan
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;126(10):1434-40. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.10.1434.
To assess and improve the accuracy of lay screeners compared with vision professionals in detecting visual impairment in secondary schoolchildren in rural China.
After brief training, 32 teachers and a team of vision professionals independently measured vision in 1892 children in Xichang. The children also underwent vision measurement by health technicians in a concurrent government screening program.
Of 32 teachers, 28 (87.5%) believed that teacher screening was worthwhile. Sensitivity (93.5%) and specificity (91.2%) of teachers detecting uncorrected presenting visual acuity of 20/40 or less were better than for presenting visual acuity (sensitivity, 85.2%; specificity, 84.8%). Failure of teachers to identify children owning but not wearing glasses and teacher bias toward better vision in children wearing glasses explain the worse results for initial vision. Wearing glasses was the student factor most strongly predictive of inaccurate teacher screening (P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of the government screening program detecting low presenting visual acuity were 86.7% and 28.7%, respectively.
Teacher vision screening after brief training can achieve accurate results in this setting, and there is support among teachers for screening. Screening of uncorrected rather than presenting visual acuity is recommended in settings with a high prevalence of corrected and uncorrected refractive error. Low specificity in the government program renders it ineffective.
评估并提高在中国农村中学生中,非专业视力筛查人员与视力专业人员相比在检测视力损害方面的准确性。
经过简短培训后,32名教师和一组视力专业人员独立测量了西昌市1892名儿童的视力。这些儿童还在政府同时开展的筛查项目中接受了卫生技术人员的视力测量。
32名教师中,28名(87.5%)认为教师进行视力筛查是值得的。教师检测未矫正的裸眼视力为20/40或更低时的敏感度(93.5%)和特异度(91.2%)优于检测矫正视力时(敏感度85.2%;特异度84.8%)。教师未能识别佩戴眼镜但未戴眼镜的儿童以及教师对戴眼镜儿童视力更好的偏见解释了初始视力检测结果较差的原因。佩戴眼镜是最能预测教师筛查不准确的学生因素(P < 0.001)。政府筛查项目检测低矫正视力的敏感度和特异度分别为86.7%和28.7%。
在这种情况下,经过简短培训的教师视力筛查可以取得准确的结果,并且教师对筛查表示支持。在矫正和未矫正屈光不正患病率较高的环境中,建议筛查未矫正的裸眼视力而非矫正视力。政府项目的低特异度使其无效。