Department of Neurology, Cincinnati Epilepsy Center, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Epilepsy Curr. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):113-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1535-7511.2008.00261.x.
The Food and Drug Administration requires rigorous testing of generic formulations of antiepileptic drugs to assure bioequivalence to the brand product and asserts that all approved formulations are interchangeable. Physician surveys, case reports, and "switchback" rates from large-scale generic conversions imply that all generic formulations may not be equal to the brand drug for all patient groups. This review presents the current state of the data on bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence and proposes a series of studies to better clarify the risks of generic formulation substitution in susceptible populations. Until such studies are completed, when switching to generic formulations, health-care providers and people with epilepsy would do well to proceed cautiously and understand the potential risks and benefits of substitution. Extra caution may be needed for patients at highest risk of seizure complications, such as the pregnant patient, patients with recurrent status epilepticus, or patients who have been seizure-free for long periods of time and are driving.
美国食品和药物管理局要求对仿制药进行严格的测试,以确保其与品牌产品具有生物等效性,并声称所有批准的配方都是可互换的。但医生调查、病例报告以及从大规模仿制药转换中得出的“回切”率表明,并非所有的仿制药在所有患者群体中都与品牌药物等效。这篇综述介绍了目前关于生物等效性和治疗等效性的数据状况,并提出了一系列研究,以更好地阐明在易感人群中替代仿制药配方的风险。在完成这些研究之前,当转换为仿制药时,医疗保健提供者和癫痫患者最好谨慎行事,并了解替代的潜在风险和益处。对于最有可能出现癫痫并发症的患者,如孕妇、反复癫痫持续状态的患者,或已经长时间无癫痫发作且正在开车的患者,可能需要格外小心。