Crepaldi-Filho René, Palma Rogério Tadeu, Giusti Marcelo Franchini, Bueno Marina de Assis Galvão, Silva Paulo Sérgio Lucas da, Waisberg Jaques
Department of Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Arq Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul-Sep;45(3):219-24. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032008000300010.
Early peritoneal recurrence of gastric carcinoma following curative resection remains a great challenge in the treatment and prevention of this disease.
To analyze the relationship between levels of tumor markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 in the sera and peritoneal washing, and anatomopathological aspects of the gastric carcinoma.
Of the 46 patients in the study, 29 (63.0%) were males and 17 (37.0%) females. Mean age was 63.6 +/- 11.7 years (31 to 91 years). Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from the upper limb vein from both patient groups after anesthetic induction, in order to determine serum levels of CEA and CA 19-9. After the end of the procedure, 50 mL of physiologic solution was introduced into the bottom of the Douglas sack and a portion aspirated to determine CEA and CA 19-9 levels in the peritoneal washing. Levels of CEA and CA 19-9 in the sera and peritoneal washing were compared to the following variables: lesion diameter < or = 4 cm or > 4 cm, lymph node involvement, angiolymphatic invasion, depth of invasion into gastric wall, and initial or late stage.
Sera CEA levels were significantly higher in patients with lesions >5 cm. CEA levels in the sera and peritoneal washing were significantly greater in patients with signet ring cell gastric carcinoma. In addition, levels of CEA in peripheral blood and peritoneal washing showed significant association with the degree of carcinoma penetration into the gastric wall, while sera CEA was significantly higher in patients at more advanced stages. There was no significant difference between sera and peritoneal CEA values regarding grade of differentiation. Patients with gastric lesions measuring > 5 cm and more differentiated lesions had significantly higher sera CA 19-9 values. In patients with lymph nodes invasion by gastric carcinoma, CA 19-9 levels in peritoneal washing were significantly higher than in peripheral blood. Levels of CA 19-9 in peritoneal washing were significantly greater at advanced stages than the initial stage of the gastric carcinoma.
Elevated levels of CA 19-9 in peritoneal washing were significantly associated with more advance stages of gastric carcinoma and was more reliable predictive factor for staging than sera CA 19-9 levels. CEA levels in the sera more accurately reflected neoplasia stage than levels in peritoneal washing.
胃癌根治性切除术后早期腹膜复发仍是该病治疗和预防中的一大挑战。
分析血清和腹腔冲洗液中肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)和CA 19-9水平与胃癌解剖病理学特征之间的关系。
本研究的46例患者中,男性29例(63.0%),女性17例(37.0%)。平均年龄为63.6±11.7岁(31至91岁)。两组患者麻醉诱导后均从上肢静脉采集外周静脉血样本,以测定血清CEA和CA 19-9水平。手术结束后,向Douglas窝底部注入50 mL生理盐水,抽取部分液体以测定腹腔冲洗液中CEA和CA 19-9水平。将血清和腹腔冲洗液中CEA和CA 19-9水平与以下变量进行比较:病变直径≤4 cm或>4 cm、淋巴结受累情况、血管淋巴管浸润、胃壁浸润深度以及早期或晚期。
病变>5 cm的患者血清CEA水平显著更高。印戒细胞型胃癌患者血清和腹腔冲洗液中的CEA水平显著更高。此外,外周血和腹腔冲洗液中的CEA水平与癌组织浸润胃壁的程度显著相关,而处于更晚期的患者血清CEA水平显著更高。血清和腹腔CEA值在分化程度方面无显著差异。胃病变>5 cm且分化程度更高的患者血清CA 19-9值显著更高。在胃癌有淋巴结转移的患者中,腹腔冲洗液中CA 19-9水平显著高于外周血。腹腔冲洗液中CA 19-9水平在胃癌晚期显著高于早期。
腹腔冲洗液中CA 19-9水平升高与胃癌更晚期显著相关,并且相比于血清CA 19-9水平,是更可靠的分期预测因素。血清CEA水平比腹腔冲洗液中的水平更准确地反映肿瘤分期。