Gupta Ruchika, Setia Namrata, Arora Prerna, Singh Sompal, Singh Tejinder
Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Hematology. 2008 Oct;13(5):307-12. doi: 10.1179/102453308X343446.
Bone marrow examination, by aspiration and/or trephine biopsy, is an important procedure in arriving at a diagnosis for long-duration febrile illness. The role of trephine biopsy in immunocompromised host, especially HIV-positive patients, has been well studied in the literature. However, its utility in immunocompetent patients is still shrouded by controversy. Thus, the authors attempted to evaluate the utility of marrow aspirate vis-à-vis trephine biopsy in establishing a diagnosis in cases of pyrexia of unknown origin in immunocompetent individuals, along with an analysis of haematological alterations in these patients.
Over a period of 8 years, 121 patients with pyrexia of unknown origin underwent both bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy as a part of diagnostic work-up. These cases were reviewed for their clinical data and hematological findings, including detailed morphological features in aspiration smears and trephine biopsies. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were compared for their diagnostic efficacy in these patients.
A wide age range (2-65 years) was noted with a slight male predominance (2 : 1). Anemia was the most common feature in peripheral blood findings, seen in 97.5% of patients. Bone marrow aspiration was diagnostic in only 16.5% of cases, which revealed leishmaniasis or pure red cell aplasia. Granulomas were infrequent in marrow aspiration smears, as only two cases (1.6%) showed ill defined epithelioid cell collections. Compared to this, trephine biopsy offered a diagnosis in 76% of the cases. Granulomas were a frequent finding in the trephine biopsy, being present in 70% of the cases included. Additional cases diagnosed on biopsy (over those diagnosed with aspiration smears) included lymphoma, tuberculosis, fungal infection, sarcoidosis and hypocellular marrow.
Bone marrow trephine biopsy is an important adjunct to aspiration in arriving at an aetiological diagnosis of patient with long-duration febrile illness, and should be routinely performed in such cases. The presence of granulomas in trephine biopsy increases the likelihood of an etiologic diagnosis in these patients.
通过骨髓穿刺和/或活检进行骨髓检查,是诊断长期发热性疾病的重要步骤。骨髓活检在免疫功能低下宿主,尤其是HIV阳性患者中的作用,在文献中已有充分研究。然而,其在免疫功能正常患者中的效用仍存在争议。因此,作者试图评估骨髓穿刺相对于骨髓活检在免疫功能正常个体不明原因发热病例诊断中的效用,并分析这些患者的血液学改变。
在8年期间,121例不明原因发热患者接受了骨髓穿刺和活检,作为诊断检查的一部分。对这些病例的临床资料和血液学检查结果进行回顾,包括穿刺涂片和活检组织的详细形态学特征。比较骨髓穿刺和活检在这些患者中的诊断效能。
患者年龄范围广泛(2 - 65岁),男性略占优势(2∶1)。贫血是外周血检查中最常见的特征,97.5%的患者出现贫血。骨髓穿刺仅在16.5%的病例中具有诊断价值,这些病例显示为利什曼病或纯红细胞再生障碍。骨髓穿刺涂片中肉芽肿少见,仅2例(1.6%)显示不明确的上皮样细胞聚集。相比之下,骨髓活检在76%的病例中提供了诊断。肉芽肿是骨髓活检中常见的发现,在所纳入病例的70%中存在。活检诊断出的额外病例(相对于穿刺涂片诊断的病例)包括淋巴瘤、结核病、真菌感染、结节病和细胞减少性骨髓。
骨髓活检是诊断长期发热性疾病病因的重要辅助手段,应常规用于此类病例。骨髓活检中肉芽肿的存在增加了这些患者病因诊断的可能性。