Suppr超能文献

髋部骨折与质子泵抑制剂治疗:权衡利弊证据

Hip fracture and proton pump inhibitor therapy: balancing the evidence for benefit and harm.

作者信息

Moayyedi Paul, Cranney Ann

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;103(10):2428-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02031.x.

Abstract

Gastroenterology is full of examples of drugs being enthusiastically promoted only to be withdrawn or prescription curtailed once the harms of the medication are realized. Cox-2 inhibitors, alosetron, and tegaserod are all recent examples of this phenomenon. The problem is that potential harms of drugs are being highlighted in the medical literature all the time and it can be difficult to determine whether these represent a genuine risk to our patients or are just spurious epidemiological associations. The association between proton pump inhibitor therapy and hip fracture is a good illustration of this dilemma. We use this example to highlight an approach that can be taken to critically evaluate the evidence for harms of medication.

摘要

胃肠病学中有很多这样的例子

药物被大力推广,但一旦意识到其危害,就会被撤市或限制处方。环氧化酶-2抑制剂、阿洛司琼和替加色罗都是这一现象的近期实例。问题在于,医学文献中一直在强调药物的潜在危害,很难确定这些危害对我们的患者来说是真正的风险,还是仅仅是虚假的流行病学关联。质子泵抑制剂治疗与髋部骨折之间的关联就是这种困境的一个很好例证。我们用这个例子来强调一种可以用来批判性评估药物危害证据的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验