Tinkelman D G, Lutz C, Conner B
Atlanta Allergy and Immunology Research Foundation, Georgia 30328.
Respir Med. 1991 Mar;85(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(06)80290-8.
Analysis of breath sounds using the stethoscope is a major part of physicians evaluation of their patients. However, the use of a stethoscope is often inadequate to give quantitative measurements of the clinical state of the individual. In this study a modification of a previously described computer analysis of breath sounds was used to measure sound intensity levels in both normal and asthmatic children who, in most cases, were unable to perform pulmonary function. The intensity levels were derived using a microcomputer-based program that digitizes audio signals and calculates energy values at 25-ms intervals throughout each signal. There were statistical differences between mean intensity levels for normal breath sounds in children between 2 and 6 years and the mean intensity levels for wheezing sounds in the same age group, as well as wheezing sounds in asthmatic patients over the age of 8 years (P less than 0.002). Also, the mean intensity levels for normal breath sounds could be clearly differentiated from intensity levels for other sounds from the chest, including heart sounds and voice sounds. Thus, computer digitized airway phonopneumography (CDAP) proved to be a reproducible, quantifiable method for demonstrating airway obstruction in those children and patients unable to perform pulmonary function testing.
使用听诊器分析呼吸音是医生评估患者的重要部分。然而,使用听诊器往往不足以对个体的临床状态进行定量测量。在本研究中,对先前描述的呼吸音计算机分析方法进行了改进,用于测量大多数情况下无法进行肺功能检查的正常儿童和哮喘儿童的声音强度水平。强度水平是通过一个基于微型计算机的程序得出的,该程序将音频信号数字化,并在每个信号的整个过程中以25毫秒的间隔计算能量值。2至6岁儿童正常呼吸音的平均强度水平与同年龄组哮鸣音的平均强度水平以及8岁以上哮喘患者的哮鸣音平均强度水平之间存在统计学差异(P小于0.002)。此外,正常呼吸音的平均强度水平可以与胸部其他声音(包括心音和语音)的强度水平明显区分开来。因此,计算机数字化气道呼吸音描记术(CDAP)被证明是一种可重复、可量化的方法,用于在那些无法进行肺功能测试的儿童和患者中显示气道阻塞。