Suppr超能文献

关于多特质多方法矩阵(MTMM)的更多内容:验证性因素分析的作用。

More on MTMM: the role of confirmatory factor analysis.

作者信息

Figueredo A J, Ferketich S L, Knapp T R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1991 Oct;14(5):387-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140510.

Abstract

This article is the second of two on the use of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as a method to assess construct validity. The construct validation criteria required by the conventional MTMM approach are satisfied only by certain ideal data sets, such as those in which the method variance of measures is very low. The CFA approach to multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) data is more general, in that violations of those stringent criteria can be managed. Another limitation of the conventional MTMM approach is that only a relatively small number of indicators can be examined by bivariate analysis. The economy of the CFA approach permits the analysis of a much larger number of indicators. In this article, a data set is analyzed using the CFA approach. Results are presented that illustrate the application of this statistical method.

摘要

本文是关于使用验证性因素分析(CFA)作为评估结构效度方法的两篇系列文章中的第二篇。传统多特质多方法(MTMM)方法所要求的结构验证标准仅在某些理想数据集(例如测量方法方差非常低的数据集)中才能得到满足。CFA方法处理多特质多方法(MTMM)数据更为通用,因为可以处理违反那些严格标准的情况。传统MTMM方法的另一个局限性是,双变量分析只能检验相对较少的指标。CFA方法的经济性允许分析更多数量的指标。在本文中,使用CFA方法分析了一个数据集。给出的结果说明了这种统计方法的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验