Pfeiffer Peter, An Natalie, Schmage Petra
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Oral Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):292-301. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60209-7.
Hypoallergenic denture base materials are commonly used for patients with allergic reactions to polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials. The goal for repaired fractured dentures fabricated from hypoallergenic denture base materials is to restore the dentures to their original strength.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the flexural properties of 7 hypoallergenic denture base materials after repair compared with a conventional PMMA-based heat-polymerizing resin.
Specimens (n=5) of the following hypoallergenic denture base materials with differing polymerization modes: Eclipse base material, Luxene, Microbase, Polyan, Puran HC, Alldent Sinomer, and The.r.mo.Free, were repaired with Versyo.com as well as the respective repair systems for 4 of the tested materials. A heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Paladon 65) was repaired using autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Palapress), which served as the control. Flexural strengths (MPa) and flexural moduli (MPa) were assessed before and after repair of each material, according to ISO 1567. The data were analyzed with repeated measures 2-way and 3-way ANOVA, 1-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni-Dunn's multiple comparisons post hoc analysis, or with the paired t test (alpha=.05).
Flexural strengths and flexural moduli of both repair methods (repair according to manufacturer's instructions or repair with Versyo.com) for all materials were significantly lower than those of the intact specimens (P<.001). Alldent Sinomer and The.r.mo.Free repaired with Versyo.com showed flexural strengths comparable to the intact material. The flexural modulus of Puran HC, Alldent Sinomer, and The.r.mo.Free repaired with Versyo.com did not differ significantly from the original, nonrepaired material. No significant differences were noted between the flexural strength (P=.616) and the flexural modulus (P=.138) values regarding the 2 repair methods of the respective materials. None of the repaired hypoallergenic denture base materials demonstrated significantly higher flexural strengths than repaired Paladon 65. Flexural strengths of repaired Puran HC and Alldent Sinomer were significantly lower than those of repaired Paladon 65 specimens (P<.001). Flexural moduli of repaired Puran HC, Alldent Sinomer, and The.r.mo.Free showed a significant decrease compared to the repaired Paladon 65 specimens (P<.001). Eclipse and Luxene passed the flexural property requirements of ISO 1567 before and after repair.
No significant influence of the repair systems was found, but the flexural properties of the repaired materials differed significantly with respect to the tested acrylic resins.
低敏性义齿基托材料常用于对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基托材料过敏的患者。用低敏性义齿基托材料修复断裂义齿的目的是使义齿恢复到原来的强度。
本体外研究的目的是调查7种低敏性义齿基托材料修复后的弯曲性能,并与传统的基于PMMA的热聚合树脂进行比较。
采用以下具有不同聚合方式的低敏性义齿基托材料制作样本(n = 5):Eclipse基托材料、Luxene、Microbase、Polyan、Puran HC、Alldent Sinomer和The.r.mo.Free,使用Versyo.com以及其中4种测试材料各自的修复系统进行修复。使用自凝丙烯酸树脂(Palapress)修复热聚合丙烯酸树脂(Paladon 65),作为对照。根据ISO 1567对每种材料修复前后的弯曲强度(MPa)和弯曲模量(MPa)进行评估。数据采用重复测量双向和三向方差分析、单向方差分析、Bonferroni-Dunn事后多重比较分析或配对t检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。
所有材料的两种修复方法(按照制造商说明修复或使用Versyo.com修复)的弯曲强度和弯曲模量均显著低于完整样本(P < 0.001)。使用Versyo.com修复的Alldent Sinomer和The.r.mo.Free的弯曲强度与完整材料相当。使用Versyo.com修复的Puran HC、Alldent Sinomer和The.r.mo.Free的弯曲模量与原始未修复材料相比无显著差异。各材料的两种修复方法在弯曲强度(P = 0.616)和弯曲模量(P = 0.138)值方面未发现显著差异。没有一种修复后的低敏性义齿基托材料的弯曲强度显著高于修复后的Paladon 65。修复后的Puran HC和Alldent Sinomer的弯曲强度显著低于修复后的Paladon 65样本(P < 0.001)。与修复后的Paladon 65样本相比,修复后的Puran HC、Alldent Sinomer和The.r.mo.Free的弯曲模量显著降低(P < 0.001)。Eclipse和Luxene在修复前后均通过了ISO 1567的弯曲性能要求。
未发现修复系统有显著影响,但修复材料的弯曲性能与测试的丙烯酸树脂相比有显著差异。