Suppr超能文献

医生对哮喘儿童年度流感疫苗接种的看法。

Physician perspectives regarding annual influenza vaccination among children with asthma.

作者信息

Dombkowski Kevin J, Leung Sonia W, Clark Sarah J

机构信息

Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0456, USA.

出版信息

Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

National guidelines have historically varied for influenza vaccination of children with asthma, depending on asthma severity. This study aims to explore perspectives of primary care physicians regarding influenza vaccination practices for children with persistent versus intermittent asthma.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to general pediatricians (n = 300) and family physicians (n = 300) in primary care offices in Michigan in 2006. The main outcome measures included physicians' influenza vaccination recommendations and reasons for nonadministration of influenza vaccine to children with asthma for the 2005-2006 influenza season.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of respondents (N = 320) reported routinely recommending influenza vaccination for children with persistent asthma; fewer (82%) reported routinely recommending influenza vaccination for those with intermittent asthma. The adjusted odds of recommending influenza vaccination for intermittent asthma patients was significantly higher among pediatricians versus family physicians (adjusted odds ratio 3.49, 95% confidence interval, 1.68-7.22), controlling for other practice characteristics. Regardless of specialty, physicians with more than 25 asthma patients were more likely than those with fewer asthma patients to routinely recommend influenza vaccination. Physicians who do not routinely recommend influenza vaccination to children with intermittent asthma were more likely to cite overlooking discussion of influenza vaccine during the visit (50% vs 13%, respectively; P < .0001) as a reason for lack of vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Influenza vaccination practices of primary care physicians reflect the inconsistencies historically found in national recommendations. Further research is warranted to determine whether the recent clarification of recommendations of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) to remove distinctions by asthma severity is associated with a reduction in missed opportunities to vaccinate.

摘要

目的

过去,针对哮喘儿童的流感疫苗接种,各国指南因哮喘严重程度而异。本研究旨在探讨初级保健医生对持续性哮喘与间歇性哮喘儿童流感疫苗接种做法的看法。

方法

2006年,向密歇根州基层医疗办公室的普通儿科医生(n = 300)和家庭医生(n = 300)邮寄了一份横断面调查问卷。主要结局指标包括医生对2005 - 2006流感季节哮喘儿童的流感疫苗接种建议以及不接种流感疫苗的原因。

结果

96%的受访者(N = 320)报告常规建议持续性哮喘儿童接种流感疫苗;而报告常规建议间歇性哮喘儿童接种流感疫苗的比例较低(82%)。在控制其他执业特征后,儿科医生对间歇性哮喘患者推荐接种流感疫苗的校正比值显著高于家庭医生(校正比值比3.49,95%置信区间,1.68 - 7.22)。无论专业如何,哮喘患者超过25名的医生比哮喘患者较少的医生更有可能常规推荐流感疫苗接种。未常规向间歇性哮喘儿童推荐流感疫苗接种的医生更有可能将在就诊期间忽略讨论流感疫苗(分别为50%对13%;P <.0001)作为未接种疫苗的原因。

结论

初级保健医生的流感疫苗接种做法反映了国家建议中历来存在的不一致性。有必要进行进一步研究,以确定国家哮喘教育与预防计划(NAEPP)最近对按哮喘严重程度区分建议进行的澄清是否与减少疫苗接种错失机会相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验