Norton Seamus P, Scheifele David W, Bettinger Julie A, West Robert M
Department of Paediatrics, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Vaccine. 2008 Jun 2;26(23):2942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.033. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
Influenza vaccination among health-care workers is poor, and the effectiveness of hospital vaccination programs remains unclear. Little is known about the effectiveness of intensive evidence-based vaccination programs in nursing staff. We determined whether the recommended vaccination rate could be achieved among paediatric nurses during an intensive promotional program for influenza vaccination. We also sought to identify the reasons for which nurses refuse the influenza vaccine and predictors of future vaccination intent.
We offered influenza vaccination to nursing staff during an influenza season through a multi-component program that included intensive promotional activities. We analysed vaccination data to determine uptake rates. In a cross-sectional survey, self-administered questionnaires were distributed to all nurses with patient contact during that season. The questionnaire evaluated their vaccine use, site of work, absenteeism and physician visits due to respiratory illness, vaccination intent for the subsequent influenza season, and other items. We surveyed vaccinated nurses regarding their program experiences and the frequency and severity of adverse reactions. Unvaccinated nurses were asked their reasons for refusing vaccination. Multiple logistic-regression analysis was conducted to identify variables that predicted the likelihood of future vaccine acceptance.
More than 75% (895/1,182) of applicable nurses were vaccinated in the program. The questionnaire response rate was nearly 48% (585/1,230). Vaccination in the program during the current season (odds ratio [OR] 101.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 52.54-197.98), program convenience (OR 199.19, 95% CI 98.01-404.11), and a physician visit for respiratory illness (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.29-4.61) were found to be independent predictors of intent to receive the vaccine the following season. A lack of perceived personal need was the most common reason for vaccine refusal, given in 30% (77/258) of unvaccinated respondents.
Adequate coverage of nurses is achievable during an intensive voluntary immunisation program against influenza, using best-known practices. Perceived lack of personal benefit is a major deterrent, while program convenience and previous vaccination strongly predict future vaccine acceptance. Our findings support interventions that improve the convenience of hospital immunisation programs for influenza, particularly those that are aimed at nurses and that promote vaccine efficacy and benefits.
医护人员的流感疫苗接种率较低,医院疫苗接种计划的效果仍不明确。对于护理人员中强化的循证疫苗接种计划的效果知之甚少。我们确定在流感疫苗强化推广计划期间,儿科护士能否达到推荐的接种率。我们还试图找出护士拒绝接种流感疫苗的原因以及未来接种意愿的预测因素。
在流感季节,我们通过一个包括强化推广活动的多组分计划,为护理人员提供流感疫苗接种。我们分析接种数据以确定接种率。在一项横断面调查中,我们向该季节所有与患者有接触的护士发放了自填式问卷。问卷评估了他们的疫苗使用情况、工作地点、因呼吸道疾病缺勤和就医情况、下一流感季节的接种意愿以及其他项目。我们调查了接种疫苗的护士关于他们参与计划的经历以及不良反应的频率和严重程度。未接种疫苗的护士被问及拒绝接种的原因。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定预测未来接受疫苗可能性的变量。
在该计划中,超过75%(895/1182)的适用护士接种了疫苗。问卷回复率接近48%(585/1230)。当前季节在该计划中接种疫苗(比值比[OR]101.99,95%置信区间[CI]52.54 - 197.98)、计划便利性(OR 199.19,95% CI 98.01 - 404.11)以及因呼吸道疾病就医(OR 2.44,95% CI 1.29 - 4.61)被发现是下一季接受疫苗意愿的独立预测因素。认为个人没有接种需求是拒绝接种最常见的原因,30%(77/258)未接种的受访者给出了该原因。
采用最知名的做法,在针对流感的强化自愿免疫计划期间,护士的足够覆盖率是可以实现的。认为缺乏个人益处是一个主要阻碍因素,而计划便利性和既往接种情况强烈预测未来的疫苗接受情况。我们的研究结果支持改善医院流感免疫计划便利性的干预措施,特别是针对护士的措施,并促进疫苗的有效性和益处。