Barry James D, Hennessy Robert, McManus John G
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Oct-Dec;12(4):432-7. doi: 10.1080/10903120802290786.
Several topical therapies have been proposed to treat acute pain from exposure to oleoresin capsaicin (OC). The purpose of this study was to determine the most beneficial topical treatment for relieving contact dermatitis pain caused by OC exposure.
We performed a single-blind, randomized human experiment evaluating the effectiveness of five different regimens for the treatment of topical facial OC exposure. Forty-nine volunteer, adult law enforcement trainees were exposed to OC during a routine training exercise and were randomized to one of five treatment groups (aluminum hydroxide-magnesium hydroxide [Maalox], 2% lidocaine gel, baby shampoo, milk, or water). After initial self-decontamination with water, subjects rated their pain using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) and then every 10 minutes, for a total of 60 minutes. Subjects were blinded to previous VAS recordings. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) (treatment, time) with repeated measures on one factor (time) was performed using a 1.3-cm difference as clinically significant.
Forty-four men and five women, with an average age of 24 years, participated in the study. There was a significant difference in pain with respect to time (p < 0.001), but no significant interaction between time and treatment (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in pain between treatment groups (p > 0.05).
In this study, there was no significant difference in pain relief provided by five different treatment regimens. Time after exposure appeared to be the best predictor for decrease in pain.
已经提出了几种局部治疗方法来治疗接触辣椒油树脂(OC)引起的急性疼痛。本研究的目的是确定缓解OC暴露引起的接触性皮炎疼痛的最有益的局部治疗方法。
我们进行了一项单盲、随机人体实验,评估五种不同治疗方案对局部面部OC暴露的治疗效果。49名成年执法学员志愿者在常规训练中接触OC,并被随机分为五个治疗组之一(氢氧化铝-氢氧化镁[maalox]、2%利多卡因凝胶、婴儿洗发水、牛奶或水)。在用清水进行初步自我去污后,受试者使用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评分,然后每10分钟评分一次,共60分钟。受试者对之前的VAS记录不知情。使用1.3厘米的差异作为临床显著差异,对一个因素(时间)进行重复测量的双因素方差分析(ANOVA)(治疗、时间)。
44名男性和5名女性,平均年龄24岁,参与了研究。疼痛在时间方面存在显著差异(p<0.001),但时间与治疗之间无显著交互作用(p>0.05)。治疗组之间的疼痛无显著差异(p>0.05)。
在本研究中,五种不同治疗方案提供的疼痛缓解没有显著差异。暴露后的时间似乎是疼痛减轻的最佳预测指标。