Koonce Jay, Schoepf Joseph U, Nguyen Shaun A, Northam Meredith C, Ravenel James G
Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):570-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1195-3. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
To investigate incidental extra-cardiac findings (ECF) at cardiac CT based on indication and impact on patient management. We retrospectively reviewed the reports of 1,764 patients who underwent a cardiac CT study between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006, including 463 calcium scorings (CS), 737 coronary CT angiograms (CTA), 341 pulmonary vein stenoses (PVS), and 223 bypass grafts (CABG). ECFs were categorized by type of examination, anatomical location and clinical significance. Comparisons were made between examination types to determine if incidental findings varied by indication. There were 507 ECFs with at least one ECF in 441 patients (25.0%). By examination, there was at least 1 ECF in 79/463 CS studies (17.1%), 196/737 CTAs (26.6%), 80/341 PVSs (23.4%) and 86/223 CABGs (38.6%). In 325 patients (18.4%), the findings were considered clinically important and occurred in 60/463 (12.9%) CSs, 149/737 (20.2%) CTAs, 56/341 (16.4%) PVSs and 60/223 (26.9%) CABGs. Differences between CABG and other indications and CTA vs. CS for incidental and clinically important findings were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Extra-cardiac findings requiring follow-up occur in 18% of patients and are significantly more frequent in coronary artery CTA and coronary artery bypass studies than in calcium scoring studies.
基于检查指征及对患者管理的影响,调查心脏CT检查时的意外心脏外发现(ECF)。我们回顾性分析了2004年1月1日至2006年12月31日期间接受心脏CT检查的1764例患者的报告,包括463例钙化积分(CS)、737例冠状动脉CT血管造影(CTA)、341例肺静脉狭窄(PVS)和223例搭桥血管(CABG)。ECF根据检查类型、解剖位置和临床意义进行分类。对不同检查类型进行比较,以确定意外发现是否因检查指征而异。441例患者(25.0%)中有507例存在至少一项ECF。按检查类型来看,463例CS检查中有79例(17.1%)至少存在1项ECF,737例CTA中有196例(26.6%),341例PVS中有80例(23.4%),223例CABG中有86例(38.6%)。325例患者(18.4%)的检查结果被认为具有临床重要性,分别出现在463例CS中的60例(12.9%)、737例CTA中的149例(20.2%)、341例PVS中的56例(16.4%)以及223例CABG中的60例(26.9%)。CABG与其他检查指征之间以及CTA与CS之间在意外发现和具有临床重要性的发现方面的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。18%的患者出现需要随访的心脏外发现,在冠状动脉CTA和冠状动脉搭桥研究中比在钙化积分研究中更为常见。