Kinoshita Sachiko, Hunt Louise
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science (MACCS) and Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1324-34. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1324.
In the number magnitude decision task ("Is the number bigger/smaller than 5?"), response to a target (e.g., 3) is faster following a masked prime congruent with the target (e.g., 1) than it is following an incongruent prime (e.g., 9). This category congruence effect has been reported to be "interference-dominant" relative to a neutral prime (e.g., the # sign, the number 5) on the basis of the analysis of mean response time (RT). Using RT distribution analysis as well as mean RTs, we identified two bases for this pattern. One relates to the choice of neutral baseline: The # prime, unlike the digit prime, does not factor in the cost of perceptual transition between the prime and target, and therefore underestimates facilitation and overestimates the interference effect. The second basis of the interference-dominant pattern is a disproportionate slowdown of congruent trials in the slow RT bins. Furthermore, this slowdown is greater for primes that had been used as targets than it is with "novel" primes that have not been responded to as targets. We interpret the results as suggesting that the category congruence effect has two components with different time courses-one based on stimulus-response mapping, and the other on semantic categorization.
在数字大小判断任务(“这个数字比5大还是小?”)中,与目标数字(如3)一致的掩蔽启动刺激(如1)之后对目标的反应,要比对不一致的启动刺激(如9)之后的反应更快。基于平均反应时间(RT)的分析,相对于中性启动刺激(如#符号、数字5),这种类别一致性效应被报告为“干扰主导”。使用反应时间分布分析以及平均反应时间,我们确定了这种模式的两个依据。一个与中性基线的选择有关:与数字启动刺激不同,#启动刺激没有考虑启动刺激和目标之间感知转换的成本,因此低估了促进作用并高估了干扰效应。干扰主导模式的第二个依据是在反应时间较长的区间内,一致性试验出现了不成比例的减速。此外,对于曾用作目标的启动刺激,这种减速比对未曾作为目标进行反应的“新”启动刺激更大。我们将这些结果解释为表明类别一致性效应有两个具有不同时间进程的成分——一个基于刺激-反应映射,另一个基于语义分类。