Garjón Parra F J, Aza Pascual-Salcedo M, Elfau Mairal M, Aller Blanco A I, Buisán Giral M J, Celaya Lecea C
Dirección de Atención Primaria, Sector Huesca, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Huesca, España.
An Pediatr (Barc). 2008 Oct;69(4):329-34. doi: 10.1157/13126557.
To identify and validate indicators to improve the assessment of prescribing by primary care paediatricians, incorporating the values and views of the professionals involved.
Nominal group technique, validated through a Delphi survey.
Paediatricians and primary care pharmacists. A nominal group was formed with thirteen specialists. The question raised at the meeting was: "What indicators focusing on the drug and what indicators linked to diagnosis and treatment do you find most helpful in assessing the quality of prescription in paediatrics?", each panellist proposed indicators that were discussed and weighted on a scale from 1 to 9. The highest scored indicators were included in a two round Delphi survey, intended for all paediatricians and primary care pharmacists.
Validity of the indicator; Indicators with a median score equal to or greater than 7 were considered valid. Degree of consensus; it was considered that there was consensus if the interquartile range was not more than 3 points.
We generated 29 indicators focusing on the drug and 27 incorporating the diagnosis. Nineteen focusing on the drug and 13 incorporating the diagnosis were included in the survey. There was a high degree of agreement between the group and survey results.
A set of quality indicators for paediatric prescribing has been generated using this tecnique, with consensus of a representative group of stakeholders and validated by all of them.
结合相关专业人员的价值观和观点,确定并验证用于改善初级保健儿科医生处方评估的指标。
采用名义小组技术,并通过德尔菲调查进行验证。
儿科医生和初级保健药剂师。由13名专家组成一个名义小组。会议提出的问题是:“在评估儿科处方质量时,您认为哪些关注药物的指标以及哪些与诊断和治疗相关的指标最有帮助?”,每位小组成员提出指标,并在1至9分的量表上进行讨论和加权。得分最高的指标被纳入两轮德尔菲调查,调查对象为所有儿科医生和初级保健药剂师。
指标的有效性;中位数得分等于或大于7的指标被认为有效。共识程度;如果四分位间距不超过3分,则认为存在共识。
我们生成了29个关注药物的指标和27个包含诊断的指标。调查纳入了19个关注药物的指标和13个包含诊断的指标。小组结果与调查结果之间存在高度一致性。
使用该技术生成了一套儿科处方质量指标,得到了一组具有代表性的利益相关者的共识,并经他们全体验证。