• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于回顾性多中心数据对评估穿透性创伤方法的比较

A comparison of methods for assessing penetrating trauma on retrospective multi-center data.

作者信息

Ahmed Bilal A, Matheny Michael E, Rice Phillip L, Clarke John R, Ogunyemi Omolola I

机构信息

University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.09.002
PMID:18929685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2693228/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

TraumaSCAN-Web (TSW) is a computerized decision support system for assessing chest and abdominal penetrating trauma which utilizes 3D geometric reasoning and a Bayesian network with subjective probabilities obtained from an expert. The goal of the present study is to determine whether a trauma risk prediction approach using a Bayesian network with a predefined structure and probabilities learned from penetrating trauma data is comparable in diagnostic accuracy to TSW.

METHODS

Parameters for two Bayesian networks with expert-defined structures were learned from 637 gunshot and stab wound cases from three hospitals, and diagnostic accuracy was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation. The first network included information on external wound locations, while the second network did not. Diagnostic accuracy of learned networks was compared to that of TSW on 194 previously evaluated cases.

RESULTS

For 23 of the 24 conditions modeled by TraumaSCAN-Web, 16 conditions had Areas Under the ROC Curve (AUCs) greater than 0.90 while 21 conditions had AUCs greater than 0.75 for the first network. For the second network, 16 and 20 conditions had AUCs greater than 0.90 and 0.75, respectively. AUC results for learned networks on 194 previously evaluated cases were better than or equal to AUC results for TSW for all diagnoses evaluated except diaphragm and heart injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

For 23 of the 24 penetrating trauma conditions studied, a trauma diagnosis approach using Bayesian networks with predefined structure and probabilities learned from penetrating trauma data was better than or equal in diagnostic accuracy to TSW. In many cases, information on wound location in the first network did not significantly add to predictive accuracy. The study suggests that a decision support approach that uses parameter-learned Bayesian networks may be sufficient for assessing some penetrating trauma conditions.

摘要

目的

创伤扫描网络(TSW)是一种用于评估胸部和腹部穿透伤的计算机化决策支持系统,它利用三维几何推理和一个带有从专家处获得的主观概率的贝叶斯网络。本研究的目的是确定一种使用具有预定义结构和从穿透伤数据中学习到的概率的贝叶斯网络的创伤风险预测方法在诊断准确性上是否与TSW相当。

方法

从三家医院的637例枪伤和刺伤病例中学习两个具有专家定义结构的贝叶斯网络的参数,并使用10折交叉验证评估诊断准确性。第一个网络包含外部伤口位置的信息,而第二个网络不包含。将学习到的网络的诊断准确性与TSW在194例先前评估病例上的诊断准确性进行比较。

结果

对于创伤扫描网络建模的24种情况中的23种,第一个网络中16种情况的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)大于0.90,21种情况的AUC大于0.75。对于第二个网络,分别有16种和20种情况的AUC大于0.90和0.75。在194例先前评估病例上,学习到的网络的AUC结果在除膈肌和心脏损伤外的所有评估诊断中均优于或等于TSW的AUC结果。

结论

对于所研究的24种穿透伤情况中的23种,使用具有预定义结构和从穿透伤数据中学习到的概率的贝叶斯网络的创伤诊断方法在诊断准确性上优于或等同于TSW。在许多情况下,第一个网络中伤口位置的信息并没有显著提高预测准确性。该研究表明,使用参数学习的贝叶斯网络的决策支持方法可能足以评估某些穿透伤情况。

相似文献

1
A comparison of methods for assessing penetrating trauma on retrospective multi-center data.基于回顾性多中心数据对评估穿透性创伤方法的比较
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
2
Evaluating the discriminatory power of a computer-based system for assessing penetrating trauma on retrospective multi-center data.基于回顾性多中心数据评估计算机系统对穿透性创伤的评估鉴别能力。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:500-4.
3
Methods for reasoning from geometry about anatomic structures injured by penetrating trauma.关于穿透性创伤所致解剖结构损伤的几何推理方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2006 Aug;39(4):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.10.005. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
4
Combining geometric and probabilistic reasoning for computer-based penetrating-trauma assessment.结合几何与概率推理进行基于计算机的穿透性创伤评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun;9(3):273-82. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m0979.
5
TraumaSCAN: assessing penetrating trauma with geometric and probabilistic reasoning.创伤扫描:运用几何与概率推理评估穿透性创伤。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:620-4.
6
Automatic identification of patients eligible for a pneumonia guideline: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two decision support models.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):493-7.
7
Urgent thoracotomy for penetrating chest trauma: analysis of 158 patients of a single center.急诊开胸术治疗穿透性胸部创伤:单中心 158 例分析。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):900-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.004.
8
Spatiotemporal Bayesian networks for malaria prediction.时空贝叶斯网络在疟疾预测中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2018 Jan;84:127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Indications for using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to diagnose diaphragmatic injuries after penetrating chest trauma.电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于诊断穿透性胸部创伤后膈肌损伤的指征。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):342-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02803-x.
10
Penetrating injuries in Germany - epidemiology, management and outcome an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.德国的穿透性损伤 - 基于创伤登记处 DGU®的流行病学、处理和结局分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 13;29(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00895-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in the detection of non-biological materials.人工智能在非生物材料检测中的应用。
Emerg Radiol. 2024 Jun;31(3):391-403. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02222-4. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Supervised embedding of textual predictors with applications in clinical diagnostics for pediatric cardiology.基于文本预测因子的监督式嵌入及其在儿科心脏病学临床诊断中的应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e136-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001792. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
3
Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the discriminatory power of a computer-based system for assessing penetrating trauma on retrospective multi-center data.基于回顾性多中心数据评估计算机系统对穿透性创伤的评估鉴别能力。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:500-4.
2
Using ontologies linked with geometric models to reason about penetrating injuries.利用与几何模型相关联的本体来推断穿透伤情况。
Artif Intell Med. 2006 Jul;37(3):167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 May 30.
3
Methods for reasoning from geometry about anatomic structures injured by penetrating trauma.
医学诊断决策支持的建模范例:调查与未来方向。
J Med Syst. 2012 Oct;36(5):3029-49. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9780-4. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
关于穿透性创伤所致解剖结构损伤的几何推理方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2006 Aug;39(4):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.10.005. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
4
Outcome prediction in chest injury by a mathematical search and display program.通过数学搜索与显示程序对胸部损伤的结果预测
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2739-48. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2739.
5
Artificial neural network medical decision support tool: predicting transfusion requirements of ER patients.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2005 Sep;9(3):468-74. doi: 10.1109/titb.2005.847510.
6
Treatment of isolated penetrating flank trauma.孤立性穿透性侧腹创伤的治疗。
Am Surg. 2005 Jun;71(6):493-6.
7
Using an ontology of human anatomy to inform reasoning with geometric models.使用人体解剖学本体来为几何模型推理提供信息。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:429-35.
8
A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy.生物医学信息学的参考本体:解剖学基础模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Dec;36(6):478-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.007.
9
Occult diaphragmatic injuries caused by stab wounds.刺伤所致隐匿性膈肌损伤
J Trauma. 2003 Oct;55(4):646-50. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000092592.63261.7E.
10
Bullet trajectory predicts the need for damage control: an artificial neural network model.子弹轨迹可预测损伤控制的需求:一种人工神经网络模型。
J Trauma. 2002 May;52(5):852-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200205000-00006.