Little M P
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(2):156-65. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn264. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
Incidence and mortality risks of radiation-associated leukaemia are surveyed in the Japanese atomic bomb (A-bomb) survivors exposed in early childhood and in utero. Leukaemia incidence and mortality risks are also surveyed in 16 other studies of persons who received appreciable doses of ionizing radiation in the course of treatment in childhood and for whom there is adequate dosimetry and cancer incidence or mortality follow-up. Relative risks tend to be lower in the medical series than in the Japanese A-bomb survivors. The relative risks in the medical studies tend to diminish with increasing average therapy dose. After taking account of cell sterilisation and dose fractionation, the apparent differences between the relative risks for leukaemia in the Japanese A-bomb survivors and in the medical series largely disappear. This suggests that cell sterilisation largely accounts for the discrepancy between the relative risks in the Japanese data and the medical studies. Excess absolute risk has also been assessed in four studies, and there is found to be more variability in this measure than in excess relative risk. In particular, there is a substantial difference between the absolute risk in the Japanese atomic bomb survivor data and those in three other (European) populations. In summary, the relative risks of leukaemia in studies of persons exposed to appreciable doses of ionizing radiation in the course of treatment for a variety of malignant and non-malignant conditions in childhood are generally less than those in the Japanese A-bomb survivor data. The effects of cell sterilisation can largely explain the discrepancy between the Japanese and the medical series.
对童年早期和子宫内受照的日本原子弹幸存者中辐射相关白血病的发病率和死亡率风险进行了调查。还对其他16项研究进行了调查,这些研究涉及在童年治疗过程中接受了可观剂量电离辐射的人群,他们有足够的剂量测定数据以及癌症发病率或死亡率随访数据。医疗系列中的相对风险往往低于日本原子弹幸存者。医疗研究中的相对风险往往随着平均治疗剂量的增加而降低。在考虑细胞绝育和剂量分割后,日本原子弹幸存者和医疗系列中白血病相对风险之间的明显差异基本消失。这表明细胞绝育在很大程度上解释了日本数据和医疗研究中相对风险之间的差异。还在四项研究中评估了超额绝对风险,发现该指标的变异性比超额相对风险更大。特别是,日本原子弹幸存者数据中的绝对风险与其他三个(欧洲)人群中的绝对风险存在很大差异。总之,在童年因各种恶性和非恶性疾病接受治疗过程中暴露于可观剂量电离辐射的人群研究中,白血病的相对风险通常低于日本原子弹幸存者数据中的风险。细胞绝育的影响在很大程度上可以解释日本数据与医疗系列之间的差异。