Seelman Katherine D
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
Assist Technol. 2008 Fall;20(3):126-37; quiz 138. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131940.
This article is a thought piece with the expansive goal of identifying policy facilitators and barriers to the development of usable and accessible advanced information and communications technology for people with disabilities across the age span at the research and development and marketing stages. The working hypothesis is as follows: The lack of participation in and representation of the interests of people with disabilities in the technology resource system is a barrier to availability of affordable consumer goods that enable independence and community integration. Converging, pervasive computing technology, especially in housing applications, is used as a case example, drawing especially from research and development conducted by the National Science Foundation Quality of Life Technology Engineering Research Center. A critical theory approach is used to identify problems and seek solutions to the apparent lack of balance between the demand and needs of disabled users and the supply and availability of usable, affordable consumer goods produced by the technology resource system in which allocation decisions are made. The approach uses policy analysis tools such as a technology assessment framework; the participation and environment components of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; and participatory action research.
本文是一篇思想性文章,其宏大目标是在研发和营销阶段,识别出有利于各年龄段残疾人开发可用且可及的先进信息与通信技术的政策促进因素和障碍。其工作假设如下:残疾人利益在技术资源系统中缺乏参与和代表性,这是阻碍提供能实现独立和融入社区的平价消费品的一个障碍。以融合性、普及性计算技术为例,尤其是在住房应用方面,特别借鉴了美国国家科学基金会生活质量技术工程研究中心开展的研发成果。采用批判理论方法来识别问题,并寻求解决技术资源系统中明显存在的、在残疾用户的需求与供给以及可用平价消费品的供应与可得性之间缺乏平衡的问题,其中分配决策已做出。该方法使用了诸如技术评估框架、世界卫生组织《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中的参与和环境部分以及参与式行动研究等政策分析工具。