Suppr超能文献

摒弃良知:法律与伦理评估

Dispensing with conscience: a legal and ethical assessment.

作者信息

Wernow Jerome R, Grant Donald G

机构信息

Northwest Center for Bioethics, Portland, OR 97215, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Nov;42(11):1669-78. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L049. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For over 30 years, pharmacists have exercised the right to dispense medications in accordance with moral convictions based upon a Judeo-Christian ethic. What many of these practitioners see as an apparent shift away from this time-honored ethic has resulted in a challenge to this right.

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze pharmacy practice standards, legal proceedings, and ethical principles behind conflicts of conscientious objection in dispensing drugs used for emergency contraception.

DATA SOURCES

We first searched the terms conscience and clause and Plan B and contraception and abortion using Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft Networks (2006-September 26, 2008). Second, we used Medscape to search professional pharmacy and other medical journals, restricting our terms to conscience, Plan B, contraceptives, and abortifacients. Finally, we employed Loislaw, an online legal archiving service, and did a global search on the phrase conscience clause to determine the status of the legal discussion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

To date, conflicts in conscientious objection have arisen when a pharmacist believes that dispensing an oral contraceptive violates his or her moral understanding for the promotion of human life. Up to this time, cases in pharmacy have involved only practitioners from orthodox Christian faith communities, primarily devout Roman Catholics. A pharmacist's right to refuse the dispensing of abortifacients for birth control according to moral conscience over against a woman's right to reproductive birth control has created a conflict that has yet to be reconciled by licensing agents, professional standards, or courts of law.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of prominent conflicts suggests that the underlying worldviews between factions make compromise improbable. Risks and liabilities are dependent upon compliance with evolving state laws, specific disclosure of a pharmacist's moral objections, and professionalism in the handling of volatile situations. Objecting pharmacists and their employers should have clear policies and procedures in place to minimize workplace conflicts and maximize patient care.

摘要

背景

30多年来,药剂师一直有权依据基于犹太 - 基督教伦理的道德信念配药。许多从业者认为,这种由来已久的伦理观念出现了明显转变,这对这项权利构成了挑战。

目的

回顾并分析在配给用于紧急避孕的药物时,良心拒服条款冲突背后的药学实践标准、法律程序和伦理原则。

数据来源

我们首先使用谷歌、雅虎和微软网络(2006年至2008年9月26日)搜索了“良心”“条款”“紧急避孕药”“避孕”和“堕胎”等术语。其次,我们使用Medscape搜索专业药学和其他医学期刊,将搜索词限制为“良心”“紧急避孕药”“避孕药具”和“堕胎药”。最后,我们利用在线法律存档服务Loislaw,对“良心条款”进行全球搜索,以确定法律讨论的现状。

数据综合

迄今为止,当药剂师认为配给口服避孕药违反其对促进人类生命的道德理解时,就会出现良心拒服条款冲突。到目前为止,药学领域的案例仅涉及东正教基督教信仰社区的从业者,主要是虔诚的罗马天主教徒。药剂师根据道德良心拒绝配给用于节育的堕胎药,这与女性的生殖节育权利产生了冲突,而许可机构、专业标准或法院尚未解决这一冲突。

结论

我们对突出冲突的分析表明,各派别之间的潜在世界观使得妥协不太可能实现。风险和责任取决于对不断变化的州法律的遵守情况、药剂师道德异议的具体披露以及处理不稳定情况时的专业精神。持反对意见的药剂师及其雇主应制定明确的政策和程序,以尽量减少工作场所冲突并最大限度地提高患者护理质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验