Phytopathology. 2007 Mar;97(3):318-24. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-3-0318.
ABSTRACT The role of fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins of Xylella fastidiosa in biofilm formation was assessed by visualization of cell aggregates of mutant strains after incubation on glass surfaces. FimA- or FimF- fimbrial mutants adhered as solitary cells at a slightly lesser frequency to glass surfaces than the parental strain; however, cell aggregates were not formed, unlike the wild-type strain. Conversely, whereas the XadA- and HxfB- nonfimbrial mutants also exhibited a much lower frequency of adherence to glass surfaces than the wild-type strain, most of the cells retained on the surfaces were in cell aggregates of different sizes, much like that of the parental strain. Neither fimbrial or afimbrial mutants formed a mature biofilm on the sides of flasks of broth cultures, unlike the dense biofilm formed by the wild-type strain. Although FimA- and FimF- mutants did not form cell aggregates on glass surfaces when incubated as individual strains, aggregates of a FimA- or FimF- mutant were observed when co-incubated with either a XadA- mutant or HxfB- mutant, respectively. These results are consistent with a model in which the fimbrial adhesins FimA and FimF are involved preferentially in cell-to-cell aggregate formation whereas the afimbrial adhesions XadA and HxfB preferentially contribute to initial cell binding to surfaces, whereupon further cell aggregation can occur. In each of five separate experiments, FimA, FimF, XadA, and HxfB mutants of X. fastidiosa all were less virulent to grape than the corresponding wild-type strain. Fimbrial and afimbrial mutants might produce a reduced biofilm within vessels of grape and, hence, be deficient in various cell-density-dependent traits required for movement through the plant and, thus, virulence.
摘要 本研究通过在玻璃表面培养突变株细胞聚集体来评估纤维蛋白和非纤维蛋白黏附素在木聚糖分解纤维单胞菌生物膜形成中的作用。与亲本菌株相比,FimA 或 FimF 纤维蛋白突变株黏附在玻璃表面的频率略低,呈单个细胞状态,而不会形成细胞聚集体;然而,野生型菌株则会形成细胞聚集体。相反,与野生型菌株相比,XadA 和 HxfB 非纤维蛋白突变株黏附在玻璃表面的频率也低得多,但大部分保留在表面的细胞聚集成不同大小的聚集体,与亲本菌株非常相似。在液体培养瓶的侧面,无论是纤维蛋白还是非纤维蛋白突变株都不能形成成熟的生物膜,而野生型菌株则形成致密的生物膜。虽然 FimA 和 FimF 突变株在单独培养时不会在玻璃表面形成细胞聚集体,但当与 XadA 或 HxfB 突变株共培养时,分别观察到 FimA 或 FimF 突变株的细胞聚集体。这些结果与一个模型一致,即纤维蛋白黏附素 FimA 和 FimF 优先参与细胞间聚集体的形成,而非纤维蛋白黏附素 XadA 和 HxfB 则优先促进初始细胞与表面的结合,从而促进进一步的细胞聚集。在五个独立实验中,木聚糖分解纤维单胞菌的 FimA、FimF、XadA 和 HxfB 突变株均比相应的野生型菌株对葡萄的毒力更低。纤维蛋白和非纤维蛋白突变株可能在葡萄的容器内产生较少的生物膜,因此在通过植物和致病性所需的各种细胞密度相关特性方面存在缺陷。