Phytopathology. 2000 Feb;90(2):157-70. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.2.157.
ABSTRACT Association of the incidence of leaf blight (caused by Phomopsis obscurans) and leaf spot of strawberry (caused by Mycosphaerella fragariae) was assessed at multiple scales in perennial plantings at several commercial farms over 3 years (1996 to 1998). For each field, the presence or absence of each disease was recorded from n = 15 leaflets in each of N approximately 70 evenly spaced sampling units, and the proportion of leaflets with blight, spot, and total disease (blight or spot) was determined. Individual diseases and total disease incidence were all well described by the beta-binomial distribution but not by the binomial distribution, indicating overdispersion of disease. The Jaccard similarity index was used to measure disease co-occurrence at the leaflet, sampling-unit, and field scales. Standard errors of this index for the lower two scales were obtained using the jackknife (resampling) procedure, and data randomizations were used to determine the expected Jaccard index for an independent arrangement of the two diseases, conditioned on the incidence and spatial heterogeneity of the observed disease data. Results based on these statistics showed that only 4 of 52 data sets at the leaflet level and no data sets at the sampling-unit level had Jaccard index values significantly different from that expected under an independent rearrangement of the two diseases. Rank correlation and cross-correlation statistics were calculated to determine the degree of covariation in incidence between the two diseases. Additionally, covariation between diseases was tested using a new procedure in the Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE) class of tests. Covariation was detected in 21% of the data sets using rank correlation methods and in 15% of the data sets using the SADIE-based approach. The discrepancy between these two methods may be due to the rank correlation procedure not taking into account the effects of spatial pattern of disease incidence. There was no relationship between mean disease incidence per field of spot and blight or between degree of heterogeneity of the two diseases (as measured by theta of the beta-binomial distribution), demonstrating lack of covariation at the field scale. Incidence of leaflets with either disease (total disease incidence) could be well predicted using a linear combination of the estimated probabilities of leaf blight and leaf spot incidence based on independence of the two diseases. Heterogeneity of total disease incidence, measured with the estimated theta parameter of the beta-binomial distribution, could also be well predicted using a linear combination of the weighted theta values for leaf blight and leaf spot, with weights proportional to incidence of the individual diseases.
摘要 在三年(1996 年至 1998 年)的时间里,在几家商业农场的多年生种植园中,在多个尺度上评估了叶枯病(由 Phomopsis obscurans 引起)和草莓叶斑病(由 Mycosphaerella fragariae 引起)的发病率。对于每个地块,从 n = 15 片叶片的每个地块中记录了每种疾病的存在或不存在,N 大约 70 个均匀间隔的采样单元,并确定了叶片的枯病、斑点和总疾病(枯病或斑点)的比例。个体疾病和总疾病的发病率都很好地由 beta-binomial 分布描述,但不是由二项式分布描述,这表明疾病的离散度很大。使用 Jaccard 相似性指数来衡量叶片、采样单元和田间尺度上的疾病共现。使用 jackknife(重采样)过程获得该指数在较低两个尺度上的标准误差,并使用数据随机化来确定两种疾病独立排列的预期 Jaccard 指数,条件是观察到的疾病数据的发生率和空间异质性。基于这些统计数据的结果表明,只有 52 个叶片水平数据集中的 4 个数据集和采样单元水平上的任何数据集的 Jaccard 指数值与两种疾病独立重排时的预期值显著不同。秩相关和交叉相关统计数据用于确定两种疾病发病率之间的协变程度。此外,使用 Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE) 测试类中的新程序测试了疾病之间的协变。使用秩相关方法检测到 21%的数据集中存在协变,使用基于 SADIE 的方法检测到 15%的数据集中存在协变。这两种方法之间的差异可能是由于秩相关过程没有考虑疾病发病率的空间模式的影响。叶斑病和叶枯病的平均发病率之间没有关系,或者两种疾病的异质性程度(用 beta-binomial 分布的 theta 来衡量)之间也没有关系,这表明田间水平上没有协变。使用基于两种疾病独立性的叶枯病和叶斑病发病率估计概率的线性组合,可以很好地预测具有两种疾病的叶片的发病率(总发病率)。使用 beta-binomial 分布的估计 theta 参数测量的总疾病发病率的异质性,也可以使用叶枯病和叶斑病的加权 theta 值的线性组合来很好地预测,权重与个体疾病的发病率成正比。