Yu Hong-Mei, Ren Xiao-Wei, Chen Qian, Zhao Jing-Yi, Zhu Ting-Juan, Guo Zhi-Xi
Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, People's Republic of China.
J Occup Health. 2008;50(6):505-11. doi: 10.1539/joh.l7167. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of coal dust workers without pneumoconiosis in mainland China. Three hundred five coal dust workers and 200 non-dust workers without pneumoconiosis from five coal mines in Shanxi province were enrolled in this study. The Chinese World Health Organization Quality of Life-brief version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire was used. Socio-demographic, working, and health factors were also collected. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was used to identify significant factors related to the four domain scores of WHOQOL-BREF. All functional domains of the Chinese WHOQOL-BREF were significantly worse in coal dust workers compared to non-dust workers except for psychological health. For the physical domain of QOL, educational level, working hours, and work danger were the significant factors. In the psychological domain, types of job, welfare satisfaction, work danger, hobbies, smoking, one-child family, and marital status were the predictive factors. Working hours, welfare satisfaction, educational level, and birthplace were the predictive factors for the social domain of QOL. Finally, the predictors for the environmental domain of QOL were types of job, working hours, welfare satisfaction, work danger, self-reported social status, smoking, and drinking. Coal dust workers without pneumoconiosis had worse QOL than non-dust workers but their subjective feelings were positive. There were four distinct models for the various domains of QOL. Corresponding health policies could be developed to improve their QOL.
本横断面研究的目的是评估中国大陆未患尘肺病的煤尘作业工人的生活质量(QOL)。本研究纳入了来自山西省五个煤矿的305名煤尘作业工人和200名未患尘肺病的非粉尘作业工人。使用了中国版世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)问卷。还收集了社会人口学、工作和健康因素。采用多元逐步回归分析来确定与WHOQOL-BREF四个领域得分相关的显著因素。除心理健康外,中国版WHOQOL-BREF的所有功能领域在煤尘作业工人中均显著差于非粉尘作业工人。对于生活质量的身体领域,教育水平、工作时间和工作危险性是显著因素。在心理领域,工作类型、福利满意度、工作危险性、爱好、吸烟、独生子女家庭和婚姻状况是预测因素。工作时间、福利满意度、教育水平和出生地是生活质量社会领域的预测因素。最后,生活质量环境领域的预测因素是工作类型、工作时间、福利满意度、工作危险性、自我报告的社会地位、吸烟和饮酒。未患尘肺病的煤尘作业工人的生活质量比非粉尘作业工人差,但他们的主观感受是积极的。生活质量的各个领域有四种不同的模型。可以制定相应的卫生政策来改善他们的生活质量。