Suppr超能文献

经静脉使用单鞘机械扩张和多种静脉入路移除起搏和植入式心脏除颤导线:2000余根导线的高成功率与安全性

Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads.

作者信息

Bongiorni Maria Grazia, Soldati Ezio, Zucchelli Giulio, Di Cori Andrea, Segreti Luca, De Lucia Raffaele, Solarino Gianluca, Balbarini Alberto, Marzilli Mario, Mariani Mario

机构信息

Arrhythmology Unit of CardioVascular Division, CardioThoracic Department, University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(23):2886-93. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn461. Epub 2008 Oct 23.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to describe a 10 years single-centre experience in pacing and defibrillating leads removal using an effective and safe modified mechanical dilatation technique.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed a single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches. We performed a venous entry site approach (VEA) in cases of exposed leads and an alternative transvenous femoral approach (TFA) combined with an internal transjugular approach (ITA) in the presence of very tight binding sites causing failure of VEA extraction or in cases of free-floating leads. We attempted to remove 2062 leads [1825 pacing and 237 implantable cardiac defibrillating (ICD) leads; 1989 exposed at the venous entry site and 73 free-floating] in 1193 consecutive patients. The VEA was effective in 1799 leads, the TFA in 28, and the ITA in 205; in the overall population, we completely removed 2032 leads (98.4%), partially removed 18 (0.9%), and failed to remove 12 leads (0.6%). Major complications were observed in eight patients (0.7%), causing three deaths (0.3%).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical single sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches is effective, safe, and with a good cost effective profile for pacing and ICD leads removal.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述采用一种有效且安全的改良机械扩张技术进行起搏和除颤导线拔除的10年单中心经验。

方法与结果

我们开发了一种采用多个静脉入路的单一机械扩张鞘管拔除技术。对于暴露导线的病例,我们采用静脉入路法(VEA);对于存在紧密粘连部位导致VEA拔除失败的病例或游离导线的病例,我们采用经静脉股静脉法(TFA)联合颈内静脉法(ITA)。我们尝试在1193例连续患者中拔除2062根导线[1825根起搏导线和237根植入式心脏除颤(ICD)导线;1989根在静脉入路处暴露,73根为游离导线]。VEA成功拔除1799根导线,TFA成功拔除28根,ITA成功拔除205根;在总体人群中,我们完全拔除2032根导线(98.4%),部分拔除18根(0.9%),未能拔除12根导线(0.6%)。8例患者(0.7%)出现主要并发症,导致3例死亡(0.3%)。

结论

采用多个静脉入路的机械单鞘管拔除技术对于起搏和ICD导线拔除有效、安全且具有良好的性价比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3b3/2638651/200d76c79693/ehn46101.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验