Belongia E A, Costa J, Gareen I F, Grem J L, Inadomi J M, Kern E R, McHugh J A, Petersen G M, Rein M F, Sorrell M F, Strader D B, Trotter H T
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2008;25(2):1-29.
To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on the management of hepatitis B.
A non-DHHS, nonadvocate 12-member panel representing the fields of hepatology and liver transplantation, gastroenterology, public health and epidemiology, infectious diseases, pathology, oncology, family practice, internal medicine, and a public representative. In addition, 22 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.
Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.
The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.
The most important predictors of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in persons who have chronic HBV are persistently elevated HBV DNA and ALT levels in blood. Other risk factors include HBV genotype C infection, male sex, older age, family history of hepatocellular carcinoma, and co-infection with HCV or HIV. The major goals of anti-HBV therapy are to prevent the development of progressive disease, specifically cirrhosis and liver failure, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma development and subsequent death. To date, no RCTs of anti-HBV therapies have demonstrated a beneficial impact on overall mortality, liver-specific mortality, or development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Most published reports of hepatitis therapy use changes in short-term virologic, biochemical, and histologic parameters to infer likelihood of long-term benefit. Approved therapies are associated with improvements in intermediate biomarkers, including HBV DNA, HBeAg loss or seroconversion, decreases in ALT levels, and improvement in liver histology (Table). Although various monitoring practices have been recommended, no clear evidence exists for an optimal approach. The most important research needs include representative prospective cohort studies to define the natural history of the disease and large RCTs of monotherapy and combined therapies, including placebo-controlled trials, that measure the effects on clinical health outcomes. Table. Criteria Useful in Determining for Whom Therapy is Indicated: Patients for whom therapy is indicated: Patients who have acute liver failure, cirrhosis and clinical complications, cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis and HBV DNA in serum, or reactivation of chronic HBV after chemotherapy or immunosuppression; Infants born to women who are HBsAg-positive (immunoglobulin and vaccination). Patients for whom therapy may be indicated: Patients in the immune-active phase who do not have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Patients for whom immediate therapy is not routinely indicated: Patients with chronic hepatitis B in the immune-tolerant phase (with high levels of serum HBV DNA but normal serum ALT levels or little activity on liver biopsy); Patients in the inactive carrier or low replicative phase (with low levels of or no detectable HBV DNA in serum and normal serum ALT levels); Patients who have latent HBV infection (HBV DNA without HBsAg). We recommend routine screening for hepatitis B of newly arrived immigrants to the United States from countries where the HBV prevalence rate is greater than 2%. Screening will facilitate the provision of medical and public health services for infected patients and their families and provide public health data on the burden of disease in immigrant populations. The screening test should not be used to prohibit immigration.
为医疗服务提供者、患者及公众提供关于乙型肝炎管理的现有数据的负责任评估。
一个由12名成员组成的非美国卫生与公众服务部(DHHS)、非倡导性小组,成员代表肝病学和肝移植、胃肠病学、公共卫生与流行病学、传染病、病理学、肿瘤学、家庭医学、内科等领域,以及一名公众代表。此外,来自相关领域的22名专家向小组和会议听众展示了数据。
专家的报告以及明尼苏达循证实践中心通过医疗保健研究与质量局编写的文献系统综述。科学证据优先于轶事经验。
小组根据公开论坛上展示的科学证据和已发表的科学文献起草其声明。声明草案在会议最后一天提交,并分发给听众征求意见。小组当天晚些时候在http://consensus.nih.gov上发布了一份修订声明。本声明是小组的独立报告,并非美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)或联邦政府的政策声明。
慢性乙肝患者发生肝硬化或肝细胞癌的最重要预测因素是血液中乙肝病毒脱氧核糖核酸(HBV DNA)和丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平持续升高。其他危险因素包括HBV C基因型感染、男性、年龄较大、肝细胞癌家族史以及合并丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)或人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染。抗乙肝治疗的主要目标是预防进展性疾病的发生,特别是肝硬化和肝衰竭,以及肝细胞癌的发生和随后的死亡。迄今为止,尚无抗乙肝治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)证明对总体死亡率、肝脏特异性死亡率或肝细胞癌的发生有有益影响。大多数已发表的肝炎治疗报告使用短期病毒学、生化和组织学参数的变化来推断长期获益的可能性。获批的治疗方法与中间生物标志物的改善相关,包括HBV DNA、HBeAg消失或血清学转换、ALT水平降低以及肝脏组织学改善(表)。尽管已推荐了各种监测方法,但尚无明确证据表明哪种方法最佳。最重要的研究需求包括具有代表性的前瞻性队列研究以确定疾病的自然史,以及单药治疗和联合治疗的大型RCT,包括安慰剂对照试验,以衡量对临床健康结局的影响。表。确定治疗适应证的有用标准:适应证患者:患有急性肝衰竭、肝硬化及临床并发症、肝硬化或晚期纤维化且血清中有HBV DNA,或化疗或免疫抑制后慢性乙肝再激活的患者;HBsAg阳性母亲所生婴儿(免疫球蛋白和疫苗接种)。可能适应证患者:处于免疫活跃期且无晚期纤维化或肝硬化的患者。通常不立即进行治疗的患者:处于免疫耐受期的慢性乙肝患者(血清HBV DNA水平高但血清ALT水平正常或肝活检显示活动度低);处于非活动携带者或低复制期的患者(血清中HBV DNA水平低或检测不到且血清ALT水平正常);患有潜伏性HBV感染的患者(有HBV DNA但无HBsAg)。我们建议对来自HBV流行率大于2%国家的新移民进行乙肝常规筛查。筛查将有助于为感染患者及其家庭提供医疗和公共卫生服务,并提供移民人群疾病负担的公共卫生数据。筛查试验不应被用于禁止移民。