• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Adhesion of sealer cements to dentin with and without the smear layer.

作者信息

Gettleman B H, Messer H H, ElDeeb M E

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

J Endod. 1991 Jan;17(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80155-5.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80155-5
PMID:1895034
Abstract

The influence of a smear layer on the adhesion of sealer cements to dentin was assessed in recently extracted human anterior teeth. A total of 120 samples was tested, 40 per sealer; 20 each with and without the smear layer. The teeth were split longitudinally, and the internal surfaces were ground flat. One-half of each tooth was left with the smear layer intact, while the other half had the smear removed by washing for 3 min with 17% EDTA followed by 5.25% NaOCl. Evidence of the ability to remove the smear layer was verified by scanning electron microscopy. Using a specially designed jig, the sealer was placed into a 4-mm wide x 4-mm deep well which was then set onto the tooth at a 90-degree angle and allowed to set for 7 days in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C. This set-up was then placed into a mounting jig which was designed for the Instron Universal Testing Machine so that only a tensile load was applied without shearing or applying preloading forces. The set-up was subjected to a tensile load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per min. The results show significant differences (p less than 0.001) among AH26, Sultan, and Sealapex, with AH26 being the strongest and Sealapex being the weakest. The only significant difference with regard to the presence or absence of the smear layer was found with AH26, which had a stronger bond when the smear layer was removed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Adhesion of sealer cements to dentin with and without the smear layer.
J Endod. 1991 Jan;17(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80155-5.
2
[Adhesion of sealer cements to dentin with and without smear layer].
Endodoncia. 1991 Apr-Jun;9(2):83-91.
3
Impact of smear layer on sealing property of root canal obturation using 3 different techniques and sealers. Part I.玷污层对使用3种不同技术和封闭剂进行根管充填封闭性能的影响。第一部分。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):e145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.033. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
4
Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha.根管封闭剂与牙本质和牙胶的黏附
J Endod. 2002 Oct;28(10):684-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200210000-00002.
5
Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal.超声振动以及各种封闭剂与水门汀组合对钛桩取出的影响。
J Endod. 2001 Jan;27(1):13-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200101000-00004.
6
The influence of smear layer on coronal leakage of Roth 801 and AH26 root canal sealers.玷污层对Roth 801和AH26根管封闭剂冠部微渗漏的影响。
Aust Endod J. 2005 Aug;31(2):66-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00228.x.
7
A comparative study of the apical leakage of four root canal sealers and laterally condensed gutta-percha.四种根管封闭剂与侧向加压牙胶尖根尖微渗漏的比较研究
J Endod. 1991 Oct;17(10):495-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81797-8.
8
Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention.丁香酚和非丁香酚根管封闭剂对桩固位的影响。
J Endod. 1998 Aug;24(8):564-7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80079-4.
9
Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer removal on the sealing ability of different sealers.关于去除玷污层对不同封闭剂封闭能力影响的长期评估
J Endod. 1999 Feb;25(2):123-5. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80010-7.
10
Apical dye penetration with four root canal sealers and gutta-percha using longitudinal sectioning.使用纵向切片法观察四种根管封闭剂与牙胶尖的根尖染料渗透情况。
J Endod. 1992 Nov;18(11):535-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81209-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of cinnamon zylanicum (true cinnamon) versus ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid smear layer removal ability: A scanning electron microscope study.桂皮(真正的肉桂)与乙二胺四乙酸去除玷污层能力的评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 May;28(5):426-430. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_94_25. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Comparison of the apical seal obtained by Adseal, Proseal, and AH26 sealers in root canal obturation with lateral compaction technique.采用侧向加压技术进行根管充填时,Adseal、Proseal和AH26封闭剂根尖封闭效果的比较。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Aug 28;20:94. eCollection 2023.
3
Efficacy of preheated chelating agents on calcium ion removal from instrumented root canals.
预热螯合剂对根管预备后根管内钙离子去除的效果。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e1015-e1020. doi: 10.4317/jced.58539. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Effect of different endodontic sealers and time of cementation on push-out bond strength of fiber posts.不同根管封闭剂及黏固时间对纤维桩推出强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1403-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2230-z. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Root canal obturation: experimental study on the thermafil system related to different irrigation protocols.根管充填:关于Thermafil系统与不同冲洗方案相关性的实验研究
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014 Nov 20;5(3):91-7. eCollection 2014 Jul.
6
Push-Out Bond Strength of Dorifill, Epiphany and MTA-Fillapex Sealers to Root Canal Dentin with and without Smear Layer.有或无玷污层时,多聚体密封剂、显影密封剂和MTA根尖封闭剂与根管牙本质之间的推出粘结强度
Iran Endod J. 2014 Fall;9(4):246-50. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Comparative study on the microleakage of three root canal sealers.三种根管封闭剂微渗漏的比较研究
Iran Endod J. 2011 Winter;6(1):1-5. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Endodontic Sealers with and without Amoxicillin-An Invitro Study.含与不含阿莫西林的三种根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的比较评价——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):228-31. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7180.3919. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
Evaluation of push-out bond strength of AH26 sealer using MTAD and combination of NaOCl and EDTA as final irrigation.使用MTAD以及次氯酸钠和乙二胺四乙酸组合作为最终冲洗液评估AH26封闭剂的推出粘结强度。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 May;10(3):359-63.
10
Bond strength of different endodontic sealers to dentin: push-out test.不同根管封闭剂与牙本质粘结强度的测试:推出试验。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):644-7. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600017.