• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[血液样本提取过程中与溶血相关的因素]

[Factors related to haemolysis in the extraction of blood samples].

作者信息

Agós M D, Lizarraga R, Gambra D, Marañón A, Orozco C, Díaz E

机构信息

Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008 May-Aug;31(2):153-8. doi: 10.4321/s1137-66272008000300005.

DOI:10.4321/s1137-66272008000300005
PMID:18953363
Abstract

The choice of a venous access system to provide safe blood collection and reliable analytical results for that sample is of paramount importance in any accident and emergency department. The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with haemolysis in venous blood samples, where the variables studied were: type of venipuncture (needle and catheter), type of catheter (3 catheters of 3 different materials) and diameter of the catheter. The sample was obtained from all patients who required a blood test in the accident and emergencies department of the Virgen del Camino Hospital over 34 days, collected in 3 different periods (September-November), involving a total of 1.933 procedures. Positive haemolysis determined by laboratory technicians was found in 2% (7/348) of samples obtained by needle compared to 14% (222/1585) obtained by catheter. We observe an 8% (39/475) of haemolysis in the samples taken by protective Teflon catheter, 18% (77/426) by Protectiv plus polyurethane and 15% (106/684) by BD-Nexiva Vialone. The haemolysis index fell with an increase in the size of the catheter, those of 18G showing 13% (115/867) and those of 20G showing 15% (107/708). The combination of catheter type and size maintains the smallest percentages of haemolysis in Teflon catheters and high diameters of 18G with 6% (19/301), less than half the haemolysis of the polyurethane catheters and a third of that for Vialone catheters respectively.

摘要

在任何急诊部门,选择一个能提供安全采血并确保样本分析结果可靠的静脉通路系统至关重要。本研究的目的是确定与静脉血样溶血相关的因素,所研究的变量包括:静脉穿刺类型(针头和导管)、导管类型(3种不同材质的3种导管)以及导管直径。样本取自维根德尔卡米诺医院急诊科34天内所有需要进行血液检测的患者,分3个不同时间段(9月至11月)采集,共涉及1933次操作。实验室技术人员判定,通过针头采集的样本中有2%(7/348)出现阳性溶血,而通过导管采集的样本中有14%(222/1585)出现阳性溶血。我们观察到,使用特氟龙保护导管采集的样本中有8%(39/475)出现溶血,使用Protectiv plus聚氨酯导管的为18%(77/426),使用BD - Nexiva Vialone导管的为15%(106/684)。溶血指数随导管尺寸增大而降低,18G导管的溶血指数为13%(115/867),20G导管的为15%(107/708)。导管类型和尺寸的组合使得特氟龙导管的溶血百分比最低,18G大直径导管的溶血率为6%(19/301),分别不到聚氨酯导管溶血率的一半和Vialone导管溶血率的三分之一。

相似文献

1
[Factors related to haemolysis in the extraction of blood samples].[血液样本提取过程中与溶血相关的因素]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008 May-Aug;31(2):153-8. doi: 10.4321/s1137-66272008000300005.
2
A comparison of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtaining blood samples.使用静脉留置针与静脉穿刺管获取血样时溶血率的比较。
J Emerg Nurs. 1996 Dec;22(6):566-9. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(96)80213-3.
3
The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on the hemolysis of ED laboratory blood samples.采血技术和设备对急诊室(ED)血液样本溶血的影响。
J Emerg Nurs. 2003 Apr;29(2):116-21. doi: 10.1067/men.2003.66.
4
Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques.急诊科护理血标本采集技术与溶血率:静脉穿刺与静脉留置针采集技术的分析
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Feb;34(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
5
Haemolyzed samples: responsibility of short catheters.溶血样本:短导管的责任。
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1994;52(7-8):523-7.
6
Observational study to determine factors associated with blood sample haemolysis in the emergency department.确定急诊科血样溶血相关因素的观察性研究。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Sep;37(9):745-8.
7
Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department.影响急诊科新置静脉穿刺部位采集的血样溶血率的因素。
J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Aug;31(4):338-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2005.05.004.
8
Comparison of two blood sampling methods in anticoagulation therapy: venipuncture and peripheral venous catheter.抗凝治疗中两种采血方法的比较:静脉穿刺与外周静脉导管采血。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01858.x. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
9
A Single-Center Prospective Study of the Effects of Different Methods of Phlebotomy in the Emergency Department on Blood Sample Hemolysis Rates.一项关于不同急诊采血方法对血标本溶血率影响的单中心前瞻性研究。
J Emerg Nurs. 2023 Jan;49(1):134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
[Can a blood sample for diagnostic exams be drawn from a peripheral venous catheter?].用于诊断检查的血样可以从外周静脉导管采集吗?
Assist Inferm Ric. 2015 Apr-Jun;34(2):86-92. doi: 10.1702/1942.21104.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric hemolysis in emergency departments: Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications.儿科急诊科溶血性贫血:患病率、危险因素及临床意义。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0299692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299692. eCollection 2024.
2
Critical review and meta-analysis of spurious hemolysis in blood samples collected from intravenous catheters.静脉留置导管采集血标本中假性溶血的批判性评价和荟萃分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(2):193-200. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.022.
3
Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDs: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis.
急诊科减少血样溶血实践的效果:实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Biochem. 2012 Sep;45(13-14):1012-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.08.002.