• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床里程碑可预测重度抑郁症(MDD)患者6个月以上的症状缓解情况及治疗选择。

Clinical milestones predict symptom remission over 6-month and choice of treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

作者信息

Wade A G, Schlaepfer T E, Andersen H F, Kilts C D

机构信息

CPS Clinical Research Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Feb;43(5):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.008
PMID:18954875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain as to what short-term outcomes predict long-term treatment compliance and outcomes in patients with MDD.

AIMS

To determine what treatment milestones predict symptom remission with long-term treatment with antidepressant medication.

METHOD

Pooled analysis of four randomised, double-blind, active comparator, 6-month trials in MDD.

RESULTS

Patients received double-blind treatment with escitalopram (N=699) or a comparator (citalopram, duloxetine, or paroxetine) (N=699). Onset of effect at week 2 was correlated with response at week 8, and response at week 8 with completion of 6-month treatment. Week 8 response was associated with a greater probability of achieving later remission. Week 24 remission (MADRS>or=10) was significantly (p<0.01) higher for patients treated with escitalopram (70.7%) than for the pooled comparators (64.7%). Week 24 complete remission (MADRS<or=5) was significantly (p<0.01) higher for escitalopram (51.7%) than for the pooled comparators (45.6%). Fewer patients discontinued treatment with escitalopram (15.9%) than with the pooled comparators (23.9%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A higher probability of achieving remission is associated with responding after 8 weeks and with completing 6 months of treatment.

摘要

背景

对于重度抑郁症(MDD)患者而言,哪些短期结果能够预测长期治疗依从性和治疗结果尚不确定。

目的

确定哪些治疗节点能够预测抗抑郁药物长期治疗后的症状缓解情况。

方法

对四项针对MDD患者的为期6个月的随机、双盲、活性对照试验进行汇总分析。

结果

患者接受艾司西酞普兰(N = 699)或对照药物(西酞普兰、度洛西汀或帕罗西汀)(N = 699)的双盲治疗。第2周起效与第8周的反应相关,第8周的反应与6个月治疗的完成情况相关。第8周的反应与后期实现缓解的可能性更大相关。接受艾司西酞普兰治疗的患者在第24周缓解(蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表>MADRS≥10)的比例(70.7%)显著高于(p<0.01)合并的对照药物组(64.7%)。艾司西酞普兰组在第24周完全缓解(MADRS≤5)的比例(51.7%)显著高于(p<0.01)合并的对照药物组(45.6%)。与合并的对照药物组(23.9%)相比,艾司西酞普兰组停药的患者更少(15.9%)(p<0.001)。

结论

实现缓解的较高概率与8周后出现反应以及完成6个月治疗相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical milestones predict symptom remission over 6-month and choice of treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).临床里程碑可预测重度抑郁症(MDD)患者6个月以上的症状缓解情况及治疗选择。
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Feb;43(5):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
2
[Clinical efficacy and achievement of a complete remission in depression: increasing interest in treatment with escitalopram].[抑郁症的临床疗效及完全缓解的达成:艾司西酞普兰治疗的关注度日益增加]
Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
3
Duloxetine versus escitalopram and placebo: an 8-month, double-blind trial in patients with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀与艾司西酞普兰及安慰剂对比:一项针对重度抑郁症患者的8个月双盲试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1303-18. doi: 10.1185/030079907X188107. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
4
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
5
A comparative study of the efficacy of long-term treatment with escitalopram and paroxetine in severely depressed patients.艾司西酞普兰与帕罗西汀对重度抑郁症患者长期治疗效果的比较研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1331-41. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115513.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in adult outpatients.艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效及耐受性:一项针对成年门诊患者的为期6周的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、活性药物对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2319-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.014.
7
Superiority of escitalopram to paroxetine in the treatment of depression.艾司西酞普兰在治疗抑郁症方面优于帕罗西汀。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;19(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
8
A randomized, double-blind, 24-week study of escitalopram (10 mg/day) versus citalopram (20 mg/day) in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.一项针对患有重度抑郁症的初级保健患者的随机、双盲、为期24周的研究,比较艾司西酞普兰(10毫克/天)与西酞普兰(20毫克/天)的疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1659-68. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65484.
9
Incidence and duration of antidepressant-induced nausea: duloxetine compared with paroxetine and fluoxetine.抗抑郁药引起恶心的发生率和持续时间:度洛西汀与帕罗西汀和氟西汀的比较
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1446-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.010.
10
Once-daily duloxetine 60 mg in the treatment of major depressive disorder: multicenter, double-blind, randomized, paroxetine-controlled, non-inferiority trial in China, Korea, Taiwan and Brazil.每日一次服用60毫克度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:在中国、韩国、台湾和巴西进行的多中心、双盲、随机、帕罗西汀对照、非劣效性试验。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Jun;61(3):295-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01666.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Stress and Residual Symptoms in Remitted and Partially Remitted Depression Using a Wearable Electrodermal Activity Device: A Pilot Study.使用可穿戴皮肤电活动设备检查缓解和部分缓解抑郁症中的压力和残留症状:一项初步研究。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2022 Dec 12;11:96-106. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3228483. eCollection 2023.
2
A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Analysis of the Residual Symptom Structure Following Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Escitalopram, Mirtazapine and Venlafaxine for Depression.认知行为疗法及艾司西酞普兰、米氮平、文拉法辛治疗抑郁症后残留症状结构的系统评价与个体患者数据网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;13:746678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.746678. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluating the efficacy of vilazodone in achieving remission in patients with major depressive disorder: post-hoc analyses of a phase IV trial.
评估维拉唑酮治疗重度抑郁症患者实现病情缓解的疗效:一项IV期试验的事后分析
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Mar;30(2):75-81. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000056.
4
Noncontinuous use of antidepressant in adults with major depressive disorders - a retrospective cohort study.成年重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁药的非持续使用——一项回顾性队列研究
Brain Behav. 2014 May;4(3):390-7. doi: 10.1002/brb3.224. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
5
The efficacy of extended-release levomilnacipran in moderate to severe major depressive disorder: secondary and post-hoc analyses from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.延长释放型左米那普仑治疗中重度重性抑郁障碍的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的次要和事后分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jan;29(1):26-35. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000009.
6
Early reduction in painful physical symptoms is associated with improvements in long-term depression outcomes in patients treated with duloxetine.早期减轻疼痛的躯体症状与度洛西汀治疗患者的长期抑郁结局改善相关。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Sep 20;11:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-150.
7
Comparative efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder.艾司西酞普兰治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效比较。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:39-49. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S12531. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
8
Do early changes in the HAM-D-17 anxiety/somatization factor items affect the treatment outcome among depressed outpatients? Comparison of two controlled trials of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) versus a SSRI.汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17 项焦虑/躯体化因子的早期变化是否会影响门诊抑郁症患者的治疗结局?圣约翰草(贯叶金丝桃)与 SSRI 对照的两项对照试验比较
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jul;26(4):206-12. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328343ba08.