Marsan Nina Ajmone, Breithardt Ole A, Delgado Victoria, Bertini Matteo, Tops Laurens F
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Europace. 2008 Nov;10 Suppl 3:iii73-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun219.
Recently, it has been suggested that a direct assessment of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony may improve the selection of candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In fact, when the established clinical and electrocardiographic selection criteria are applied, response to CRT may vary widely and up to one-third of the patients fail to benefit from CRT. Echocardiography has been extensively applied to assess LV dyssynchrony and to predict favourable response to CRT, using different two- and three-dimensional modalities. In this review, the value of these echocardiographic modalities will be discussed, highlighting the advantages and drawbacks of each technique and evaluating the clinical implications and future perspectives of LV dyssynchrony assessment.
最近,有人提出直接评估左心室(LV)机械性不同步可能会改善心脏再同步治疗(CRT)候选者的选择。事实上,当应用既定的临床和心电图选择标准时,CRT的反应可能差异很大,多达三分之一的患者无法从CRT中获益。超声心动图已被广泛应用于评估LV不同步,并使用不同的二维和三维模式预测对CRT的良好反应。在这篇综述中,将讨论这些超声心动图模式的价值,突出每种技术的优缺点,并评估LV不同步评估的临床意义和未来前景。