Hassett Michael J, Hughes Melissa E, Niland Joyce C, Edge Stephen B, Theriault Richard L, Wong Yu-Ning, Wilson John, Carter W Bradford, Blayney Douglas W, Weeks Jane C
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5553-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9705. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
To describe the frequency of chemotherapy use for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, lymph node (LN)-negative breast cancer from 1997 to 2004 at eight National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions, to explore whether chemotherapy use varied over time and between institutions, and to identify factors associated with the decision to forego chemotherapy.
Among women younger than age 70 years with HR-positive, LN-negative breast cancer measuring more than 1 cm, we analyzed the frequency of chemotherapy use on a yearly basis. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed the relationship between receipt of chemotherapy and year of diagnosis, institution, tumor features, and patient characteristics. Interaction terms were added to the model, and stratified analyses were conducted to further explore the determinants of chemotherapy use.
Fifty-five percent of 3,190 women received chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use was less common for patients with 1.1- to 2-cm tumors than for patients tumors greater 2 cm (47% v 87%, respectively; P < .01) and for women age 60 to 69 years versus women younger than age 50 years (24% v 76%, respectively; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, predictors independently associated with receiving chemotherapy included larger tumor size, higher grade, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression, younger age, and institution (P < .01 for all). Institutions exhibited dramatically different rates of chemotherapy use (from 46% to 65%) and patterns of change in chemotherapy use over time (from a 79% relative increase to a 22% relative decrease).
Although institutions seemed to agree that not all women with HR-positive, LN-negative breast cancer need chemotherapy, there did not seem to be consensus regarding which women should get chemotherapy. Only prospective randomized controlled trials will conclusively establish which subtypes of HR-positive, LN-negative breast cancer benefit from chemotherapy.
描述1997年至2004年期间,八家美国国立综合癌症网络机构中激素受体(HR)阳性、淋巴结(LN)阴性乳腺癌患者使用化疗的频率,探讨化疗使用情况是否随时间及机构不同而变化,并确定与放弃化疗决策相关的因素。
在年龄小于70岁、HR阳性、LN阴性且肿瘤直径大于1 cm的乳腺癌女性患者中,我们逐年分析化疗使用频率。多变量逻辑回归模型评估化疗接受情况与诊断年份、机构、肿瘤特征及患者特征之间的关系。向模型中加入交互项,并进行分层分析以进一步探究化疗使用的决定因素。
3190名女性患者中,55%接受了化疗。肿瘤直径为1.1至2 cm的患者比肿瘤直径大于2 cm的患者化疗使用频率更低(分别为47%和87%;P <.01),60至69岁女性患者比年龄小于50岁的女性患者化疗使用频率更低(分别为24%和76%;P <.01)。多变量分析显示,与接受化疗独立相关的预测因素包括肿瘤体积更大、分级更高、人表皮生长因子受体2过表达、年龄更小以及机构(所有P值均<.01)。各机构的化疗使用频率差异显著(从46%至65%),且化疗使用随时间的变化模式也不同(从相对增加79%到相对减少22%)。
尽管各机构似乎都认同并非所有HR阳性、LN阴性乳腺癌女性患者都需要化疗,但对于哪些女性患者应接受化疗似乎并未达成共识。只有前瞻性随机对照试验才能最终确定HR阳性、LN阴性乳腺癌的哪些亚型能从化疗中获益。