Gold Michael R, Ip John H, Costantini Otto, Poole Jeanne E, McNulty Steven, Mark Daniel B, Lee Kerry L, Bardy Gust H
Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-5920, USA.
Circulation. 2008 Nov 11;118(20):2022-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748962. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
Sudden cardiac death remains a leading cause of mortality despite advances in medical treatment for the prevention of ischemic heart disease and heart failure. Recent studies showed a benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, but appropriate shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias were noted only in a minority of patients during 4 to 5 years of follow-up. Accordingly, better risk stratification is needed to optimize patient selection. In this regard, microvolt T-wave alternans (TWA) has emerged as a potentially useful measure of arrhythmia vulnerability, but it has not been evaluated previously in a prospective, randomized trial of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.
This investigation was a prospective substudy of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) that included 490 patients at 37 clinical sites. TWA tests were classified by blinded readers as positive (37%), negative (22%), or indeterminate (41%) by standard criteria. The composite primary end point was the first occurrence of any of the following events: sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge. During a median follow-up of 30 months, no significant differences in event rates were found between TWA-positive or -negative patients (hazard ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 2.59, P=0.56) or TWA-negative and nonnegative (positive and indeterminate) subjects (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 2.53, P=0.46). Similar results were obtained with the inclusion or exclusion of patients randomized to amiodarone in the analyses.
TWA testing did not predict arrhythmic events or mortality in SCD-HeFT, although a small reduction in events (20% to 25%) among TWA-negative patients cannot be excluded given the sample size of this study. Accordingly, these results suggest that TWA is not useful as an aid in clinical decision making on implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy among patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
尽管在预防缺血性心脏病和心力衰竭的医学治疗方面取得了进展,但心脏性猝死仍然是主要的死亡原因。最近的研究表明植入式心脏复律除颤器植入有益,但在4至5年的随访期间,只有少数患者出现了针对室性快速心律失常的适当电击。因此,需要更好的风险分层来优化患者选择。在这方面,微伏级T波交替(TWA)已成为心律失常易感性的一种潜在有用指标,但此前尚未在植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的前瞻性随机试验中进行评估。
本研究是心力衰竭心脏性猝死试验(SCD-HeFT)的一项前瞻性子研究,纳入了37个临床地点的490例患者。TWA测试由不知情的读者根据标准标准分类为阳性(37%)、阴性(22%)或不确定(41%)。复合主要终点是首次发生以下任何一种事件:心脏性猝死、持续性室性心动过速/心室颤动或植入式心脏复律除颤器的适当放电。在中位随访30个月期间,TWA阳性或阴性患者之间(风险比1.24,95%置信区间0.60至2.59,P = 0.56)或TWA阴性与非阴性(阳性和不确定)受试者之间(风险比1.28,95%置信区间0.65至2.53,P = 0.46)的事件发生率无显著差异。在分析中纳入或排除随机接受胺碘酮治疗的患者也得到了类似结果。
在SCD-HeFT中,TWA测试不能预测心律失常事件或死亡率,尽管鉴于本研究的样本量,不能排除TWA阴性患者中事件有小幅减少(20%至25%)的情况。因此,这些结果表明,TWA无助于心力衰竭和左心室收缩功能障碍患者植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的临床决策。