Suppr超能文献

[The peritoneal transport type might be distinctive among different Mexican populations on CAPD].

作者信息

Rojas-Campos Enrique, Martínez-Ramírez Héctor Ramón, Cortés-Sanabria Laura, González Liliana, Martín-del-Campo Fabiola, Monteón-Ramos Francisco, Gómez-Navarro Benjamin, Cueto-Manzano Alfonso Martín

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Renales, Departamento de Nefrología Hospital de Especialidades.

出版信息

Rev Invest Clin. 2008 Jul-Aug;60(4):284-91.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The peritoneal equilibration test (PET), standardized by Twardowski et al. more than 20 years ago, is the most common test to classify peritoneal transport. Some reference values from Mexican population were established in the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ) 10 years ago. The aims of this study were to evaluate the peritoneal transport in a population from the west of Mexico, and compare results with those obtained in the studies of Twardowski and the INCMNSZ.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study, performed in 156 patients. All consecutive CAPD patients to whom a PET was performed between January 2000 and January 2004 were included. Each patient had a standard PET consistent on infusion of a freshly 2L dialysis exchange at 2.5% after drainage of the previous nocturnal exchange; 3 dialysis aliquots at 0, 2 and 4 hours, and a blood sample at 2 hours, are obtained after infusion. Results were compared to those reported by Twardowski and INCMNSZ.

RESULTS

From the total of patients, 48% were diabetics and 62% were men. Mean age was 46 +/- 16 years and body surface area was 1.70 +/- 0.23 m2. There were no differences between groups regarding diabetes and peritonitis. Time on dialysis was shorter in our study than in the INCMNSZ (14.6 +/- 17.8 vs. 20.8 +/- 21.4 months; p < 0.05). Compared to those from Twardowski and INCMNSZ, creatinine D/P ratios at 0, 2 and 4 h of our study were higher, whereas D/D0 ratios at 2 and 4 h, and PET drained volume, were lower. Using reference values obtained in the present study, high transport (H) was present in 18%, high average (HA) in 33%, low average (LA) in 34% and low (L) in 15%, whereas employing the INCMNSZ reference values, H was present in 23%, HA in 36%, LA in 33% and L in 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients from this studied population had mean peritoneal transport values higher than those obtained in other studies, including Mexican values. Ideally, it is recommendable to determine reference values in all peritoneal dialysis centers, as extrapolating results from other regions may lead to errors in diagnosing the peritoneal transport type.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验