Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Pardubice University, CZ-532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Talanta. 2002 Jun 10;57(4):721-40. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(02)00095-4.
Building a calibration model with detection and quantification capabilities is identical to the task of building a regression model. Although commonly used by analysts, an application of the calibration model requires at first careful attention to the three components of the regression triplet (data, model, method), examining (a) the data quality of the proposed model; (b) the model quality; (c) the LS method to be used or a fulfillment of all least-squares assumptions. This paper summarizes these components, describes the effects of deviations from assumptions and considers the correction of such deviations: identifying influential points is the first step in least-squares model building, the calibration task depends on the regression model used, and finally the least squares LS method is based on assumptions of normality of errors, homoscedasticity, independence of errors, overly influential data points and independent variables being subject to error. When some assumptions are violated, the ordinary LS is inconvenient and robust M-estimates with the iterative method of reweighted least-squares must be used. The effects of influential points, heteroscedasticity and non-normality on the calibration precision limits are also elucidated. This paper also considers the proper construction of the statistical uncertainty expressed as confidence limits predicting an unknown concentration (or amount) value, and its dependence on the regression triplet. The authors' objectives were to provide a thorough treatment that includes pertinent references, consistent nomeclature, and related mathematical formulae to show by theory and illustrative examples those approaches best suited to typical problems in analytical chemistry. Two new algorithms, calibration and linear regression written in s-plus and enabling regression triplet analysis, the estimation of calibration precision limits, critical levels, detection limits and quantification limits with the statistical uncertainty of unknown concentrations, form the goal of this paper.
建立具有检测和定量能力的校准模型与建立回归模型的任务相同。尽管分析师通常会使用校准模型,但在首次应用时,需要仔细注意回归三元组的三个组成部分(数据、模型和方法),检查:(a) 拟议模型的数据质量;(b) 模型质量;(c) 将要使用的最小二乘方法或满足所有最小二乘假设的情况。本文总结了这些组成部分,描述了偏离假设的影响,并考虑了对这些偏差的纠正:识别影响点是建立最小二乘模型的第一步,校准任务取决于所使用的回归模型,最后,最小二乘 LS 方法基于误差正态性、同方差性、误差独立性、过度影响数据点和自变量存在误差的假设。当某些假设被违反时,普通 LS 不方便,必须使用具有迭代重加权最小二乘法的稳健 M 估计。还阐明了影响点、异方差性和非正态性对校准精度限制的影响。本文还考虑了以置信限的形式正确构建统计不确定性,用于预测未知浓度(或量)值,以及其对回归三元组的依赖性。作者的目标是提供全面的处理方法,包括相关参考文献、一致的命名法和相关数学公式,通过理论和说明性示例展示最适合分析化学中典型问题的方法。两个新算法,校准和线性回归,用 s-plus 编写,能够进行回归三元组分析,估计校准精度限制、临界水平、检测限和定量限以及未知浓度的统计不确定性,是本文的目标。