Liu Taiming, Guo Yuyi, Gao Zhaoxia, Chen Zhuo, Jiang Xuehua
Key Laboratory of Drug Targeting, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China.
Pharmazie. 2008 Oct;63(10):718-20.
A randomized, three-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy Chinese male volunteers to compare the bioavailability of two brands of D-limonene (0.3 ml) capsules, and determine the plasma concentration of endogenous D-limonene in food-controlled non-treated humans. The three kinds of treatments were administration of the reference formulation, administration of the test, and non-administration. The plasma samples were analyzed by a validated GC-MS method after liquid-liquid extraction. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, tmax, and t1/2 were determined from the concentration-time profiles for both formulations and were compared statistically to evaluate bioequivalence between the two brands. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not show any significant difference between the two formulations and 90% confidence intervals fell within an acceptable range for bioequivalence. Besides, for the food-controlled non-treated volunteers, their plasma concentrations of D-limonene were detectable and kept relatively steady (2.94 +/- 1.38 ng/ml) within the sample collection period. Based on the statistical analysis, it was concluded that the two D-limonene capsule formulations were bioequivalent.
对24名健康中国男性志愿者进行了一项随机、三阶段交叉研究,以比较两种品牌的D-柠檬烯(0.3毫升)胶囊的生物利用度,并测定食物控制下未接受治疗的人体中内源性D-柠檬烯的血浆浓度。三种治疗方法分别为服用参比制剂、服用试验制剂和不服用。血浆样本经液液萃取后,采用经验证的气相色谱-质谱法进行分析。根据两种制剂的浓度-时间曲线确定药代动力学参数AUC(0-t)、AUC(0-∞)、Cmax、tmax和t1/2,并进行统计学比较,以评估两个品牌之间的生物等效性。方差分析(ANOVA)未显示两种制剂之间有任何显著差异,90%置信区间落在生物等效性可接受范围内。此外,对于食物控制下未接受治疗的志愿者,其血浆中D-柠檬烯浓度在样本采集期内可检测到且保持相对稳定(2.94±1.38纳克/毫升)。基于统计分析,得出结论:两种D-柠檬烯胶囊制剂具有生物等效性。