• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过关键决策点评估旨在影响不均衡现象的多系统努力。

Evaluating multisystemic efforts to impact disproportionality through key decision points.

作者信息

Derezotes Dennette, Richardson Brad, King Connie Bear, Kleinschmit-Rembert Julia, Pratt Betty

机构信息

Race Matters Consortium, Westat, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA.

出版信息

Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):241-54.

PMID:18972941
Abstract

Working in four communities, Casey Foundation/Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP) Alliance on Racial Equity (the Alliance) have developed a Racial Equity Scorecard for measuring disproportionality at key decision points for use in impacting disproportionality in the child welfare system. The four communities include King County, Washington; Guilford County, North Carolina; Ramsey County, Minnesota; and Woodbury County, Iowa. Data from one site--Woodbury County, Iowa--are used as an example. This article provides the background and method for identification and measurement of key decision points in the child welfare system to track change effected by multisystemic approaches to reduce disproportionality. Interpretation of the results in the scorecard is provided and recommendations for future interventions based on the data are discussed.

摘要

凯西基金会/社会政策研究中心(CSSP)种族公平联盟(以下简称“联盟”)在四个社区开展工作,制定了一份种族公平记分卡,用于衡量儿童福利系统关键决策点上的不均衡现象,以影响该系统中的不均衡状况。这四个社区包括华盛顿州金县、北卡罗来纳州吉尔福德县、明尼苏达州拉姆齐县和爱荷华州伍德伯里县。本文以爱荷华州伍德伯里县这一地点的数据为例,介绍了儿童福利系统中关键决策点的识别和衡量背景及方法,以追踪多系统方法为减少不均衡所带来的变化。文中还给出了记分卡结果的解读,并讨论了基于这些数据的未来干预建议。

相似文献

1
Evaluating multisystemic efforts to impact disproportionality through key decision points.通过关键决策点评估旨在影响不均衡现象的多系统努力。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):241-54.
2
Comparative analysis of two community-based efforts designed to impact disproportionality.旨在影响不均衡现象的两项基于社区的工作的比较分析
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):297-317.
3
Gaps in research and public policies.研究与公共政策中的差距。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):359-67.
4
Children ever in care: an examination of cumulative disproportionality.曾受照料的儿童:累积不均衡性研究
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):169-88.
5
Addressing disproportionality through undoing racism, leadership development, and community engagement.通过消除种族主义、领导力发展和社区参与来解决不均衡问题。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):279-96.
6
Point of engagement: reducing disproportionality and improving child and family outcomes.介入点:减少不均衡现象并改善儿童及家庭的状况。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):335-58.
7
The benefits of life table analysis for describing disproportionality.生命表分析在描述不均衡性方面的益处。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):189-202.
8
Disproportionality in child welfare.儿童福利中的不均衡现象。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):11-20.
9
Addressing the disproportionate representation of children of color: a collaborative community approach.解决有色人种儿童代表性不足的问题:一种社区协作方法。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):255-78.
10
Taking action on racial disproportionality in the child welfare system.针对儿童福利系统中的种族不均衡问题采取行动。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):319-34.