Leroy V
Clinique d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, pôle DIGI-DUNE, CHU de Grenoble; INSERM/UJ FU823, IAPC, IAB, Grenoble.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Sep;32(6 Suppl 1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/S0399-8320(08)73993-9.
An intensive research effort in the field of non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis has recently permitted the description and validation of several serum markers of fibrosis, mainly in chronic hepatitis C patients. In addition to the commonly used tests such as FibroTest or FibroMeters, other either indirect (aspartate aminotransferase, prothrombin time, platelets) or direct (PIIINP, hyaluronic acid, metalloproteinases) markers, usually used in combination, have been evaluated. Simple scores such as APRI or FIB-4 have also been widely studied and have revealed interesting, albeit non-comprehensive, data on liver fibrosis, especially in terms of significant, extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis. These simple scores may be proposed as a first-line investigation, bearing in mind their limitations and comparing them with more accurate methods for evaluating liver fibrosis if necessary. Other scores, including direct serum markers, which can be difficult to assess, have given disappointing results that, in general, were either similar to, or only slightly better than, the results of the simpler tests. Further studies are needed to identify new markers that are more accurate and, above all, able to predict the outcome of liver fibrosis.
最近,在肝纤维化非侵入性评估领域开展的一项深入研究,使得人们能够描述和验证多种纤维化血清标志物,主要针对慢性丙型肝炎患者。除了常用检测方法,如FibroTest或FibroMeters外,其他间接(天冬氨酸转氨酶、凝血酶原时间、血小板)或直接(III型前胶原氨基端肽、透明质酸、金属蛋白酶)标志物,通常联合使用,也已得到评估。诸如APRI或FIB-4等简单评分也得到广泛研究,并揭示了关于肝纤维化的有趣数据,尽管并不全面,尤其是在显著、广泛纤维化或肝硬化方面。这些简单评分可作为一线检查方法,但要记住其局限性,并在必要时与评估肝纤维化的更准确方法进行比较。其他评分,包括可能难以评估的直接血清标志物,结果令人失望,总体上与更简单检测方法的结果相似,或仅略好于后者。需要进一步研究以确定更准确的新标志物,最重要的是能够预测肝纤维化的转归。