Suppr超能文献

内科住院患者的合理血栓预防:仍未完全实现。

Rational thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients: not quite there yet.

作者信息

Millar J Alasdair

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2008 Nov 3;189(9):504-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02145.x.

Abstract

Routine thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients is based on trials that predominantly use asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as the endpoint. As asymptomatic DVT is 10-30-fold more common than symptomatic DVT, this exaggerates estimates of benefit and cost-effectiveness. Based on symptomatic disease, the number needed to treat per venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevented is high (150-1600), and the true cost-effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis for symptomatic event reduction is uncertain. The incidence of major bleeding among patients receiving prophylaxis is at least equal to the reduction in clinical VTE. Routine thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients is not warranted, and better patient selection is needed.

摘要

住院内科患者的常规血栓预防措施是基于主要将无症状深静脉血栓形成(DVT)作为终点的试验。由于无症状DVT比有症状DVT常见10至30倍,这夸大了对益处和成本效益的估计。基于有症状疾病,预防每例静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)所需治疗的人数很高(150 - 1600),并且预防有症状事件的真正成本效益尚不确定。接受预防措施的患者中大出血的发生率至少与临床VTE的减少率相当。住院内科患者不适合进行常规血栓预防,需要更好地选择患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验