Klucken T, Kagerer S, Schweckendiek J, Tabbert K, Vaitl D, Stark R
Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Otto-Behaghel-Strasse 10 H, 35394 Giessen, Germany.
Neuroscience. 2009 Jan 23;158(2):721-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.049. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
One way of investigating affective learning is the use of aversive pictures as unconditioned stimuli (UCS) in conditioning paradigms. In the last decades, there has been a heated debate on the influence of contingency awareness on conditioned responses (CRs). Only a few studies found CRs in contingency unaware subjects whereas other studies only reported conditioned reactions in contingency aware participants. However, as a shortcoming, most studies employing picture-picture paradigms only investigated one response level (e.g. changes in subjective ratings). Further, changes in brain activity have so far been neglected in this field of research. The aim of the present study was to investigate different response levels with respect to contingency awareness: brain activity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), skin conductance responses (SCRs) and valence ratings. A neutral geometric shape (conditioned stimulus, CS+) was followed by aversive pictures, whereas another shape (CS-) preceded neutral pictures. Unaware participants showed CRs in brain activity (e.g. the insula). Generally more activity was observed in the fear network (e.g. the amygdala, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex) in aware participants and in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). Investigation of SCRs and valence ratings revealed that only aware participants showed conditioned reactions. Our results point toward dissociations between response levels (e.g. brain activity) not affected by contingency awareness and more cognitive response levels (e.g. subjective ratings and SCRs) which are affected by contingency awareness. As a unique finding in human aversive conditioning, we discuss the role of the nucleus accumbens as well as practical implications for affective learning models.
研究情感学习的一种方法是在条件反射范式中使用厌恶图片作为无条件刺激(UCS)。在过去几十年里,关于偶然性意识对条件反应(CRs)的影响一直存在激烈争论。只有少数研究在无偶然性意识的受试者中发现了CRs,而其他研究只报告了有偶然性意识的参与者的条件反应。然而,作为一个缺点,大多数采用图片-图片范式的研究只调查了一个反应水平(例如主观评分的变化)。此外,迄今为止,该研究领域一直忽视了大脑活动的变化。本研究的目的是针对偶然性意识调查不同的反应水平:通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量的大脑活动、皮肤电导反应(SCRs)和效价评分。一个中性几何形状(条件刺激,CS+)之后是厌恶图片,而另一个形状(CS-)之前是中性图片。无偶然性意识的参与者在大脑活动(例如脑岛)中表现出CRs。一般来说,有偶然性意识的参与者以及伏隔核(NAcc)中的恐惧网络(例如杏仁核、外侧眶额皮质)中观察到更多活动。对SCRs和效价评分的调查显示,只有有偶然性意识的参与者表现出条件反应。我们的结果表明,不受偶然性意识影响的反应水平(例如大脑活动)与受偶然性意识影响的更多认知反应水平(例如主观评分和SCRs)之间存在分离。作为人类厌恶条件反射中的一个独特发现,我们讨论了伏隔核的作用以及对情感学习模型的实际影响。