Suppr超能文献

条件性恐惧反射中,关于偶发意识的神经回路。

Neurocircuitry of Contingency Awareness in Pavlovian Fear Conditioning.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3901 Chrysler Dr., Tolan Park Suite 2C Room 273, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct;21(5):1039-1053. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00909-6. Epub 2021 May 15.

Abstract

In Pavlovian fear conditioning, contingency awareness provides an indicator of explicit fear learning. A less studied aspect of fear-based psychopathologies and their treatment, awareness of learned fear is a common cause of distress in persons with such conditions and is a focus of their treatment. The present work is a substudy of a broader fear-conditioning fMRI study. Following fear conditioning, we identified a subset of individuals who did not exhibit explicit awareness of the CS-US contingency. This prompted an exploratory analysis of differences in "aware" versus "unaware" individuals after fear conditioning. Self-reported expectancies of the CS-US contingency obtained immediately following fear conditioning were used to differentiate the two groups. Results corrected for multiple comparisons indicated significantly greater BOLD signal in the bilateral dlPFC, right vmPFC, bilateral vlPFC, left insula, left hippocampus, and bilateral amygdala for the CS+>CS- contrast in the aware group compared with the unaware group (all p values ≤ 0.004). PPI analysis with a left hippocampal seed indicated stronger coupling with the dlPFC and vmPFC in the aware group compared with the unaware group (all p values ≤ 0.002). Our findings add to our current knowledge of the networks involved in explicit learning and awareness of conditioned fear, with important clinical implications.

摘要

在巴甫洛夫式恐惧条件反射中,条件性意识提供了明确恐惧学习的指标。恐惧相关精神病理学及其治疗的一个研究较少的方面是,对习得性恐惧的意识是此类病症患者痛苦的常见原因,也是其治疗的重点。本工作是更广泛的恐惧条件反射 fMRI 研究的子研究。在恐惧条件反射之后,我们确定了一组个体,他们没有表现出对 CS-US 条件性的明确意识。这促使我们对恐惧条件反射后“有意识”和“无意识”个体进行了探索性分析。在恐惧条件反射后立即获得的对 CS-US 条件性的自我期望被用来区分这两组。经多重比较校正的结果表明,有意识组的双侧 dlPFC、右侧 vmPFC、双侧 vlPFC、左侧岛叶、左侧海马体和双侧杏仁核的 CS+>CS- 对比的 BOLD 信号显著更大(所有 p 值均≤0.004)。用左侧海马体种子进行 PPI 分析表明,有意识组与无意识组相比,与 dlPFC 和 vmPFC 的耦合更强(所有 p 值均≤0.002)。我们的发现增加了我们对参与明确学习和条件性恐惧意识的网络的现有认识,具有重要的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验