Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物治疗下的胃肠道症状:口服缓释氢吗啡酮、透皮芬太尼和透皮丁丙诺啡的前瞻性比较

Gastrointestinal symptoms under opioid therapy: a prospective comparison of oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine.

作者信息

Wirz Stefan, Wittmann Maria, Schenk Michael, Schroeck Andreas, Schaefer Nico, Mueller Marcus, Standop Jens, Kloecker Norbert, Nadstawek Joachim

机构信息

Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pain Clinic, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2009 Aug;13(7):737-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine on nausea, emesis and constipation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Randomly selected outpatients with cancer pain receiving one of the study medications were enrolled in a prospective, open-labeled, controlled trial (n=174). Mobility, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed directly and per selected item on the ECOG (Eastern Cancer Oncology Group), EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) questionnaires, NRS (Numerical Rating Scales), and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Demographic and medical data were comparable in all groups. Only 15% of patients suffered from constipation. 59% took the prescribed laxatives. The incidence of stool free periods >72 h was significantly higher with transdermal opioids (transdermal fentanyl: 22%; transdermal buprenorphine: 21%; oral hydromorphone: 2%; p=0.003). 21% of patients revealed nausea and emesis. The mean NRS for nausea (transdermal fentanyl:1.3; transdermal buprenorphine: 1.2; oral hydromorphone: 1.5; p=0.6), the consumption of antiemetics (transdermal fentanyl: 42%; transdermal buprenorphine: 33%; oral hydromorphone: 36%; p=0.6) and laxatives (transdermal fentanyl:53%; transdermal buprenorphine:66%; oral hydromorphone: 61%; p=0.2) did not differ significantly, in contrast to the score for emesis (transdermal fentanyl: 16%; transdermal buprenorphine:13%; oral hydromorphone: 33%; p=0.02). Morphine equivalent opioid doses differed (mg/d transdermal fentanyl: 183; transdermal buprenorphine: 89; oral hydromorphone: 143; p=0.001), because of obvious tolerance varying after long-term treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal symptoms of cancer pain patients undergoing an opioid therapy are related to multifactorial causes. Transdermal opioids showed no benefit over oral controlled-release hydromorphone with regard to gastrointestinal symptoms. The conversion ratios for transdermal fentanyl, transdermal buprenorphine, and oral hydromorphone did not accord to the literature, because of differing occurrences of opioid tolerance after long-term therapy.

摘要

引言

本试验旨在评估口服缓释氢吗啡酮、透皮芬太尼和透皮丁丙诺啡长期治疗对恶心、呕吐和便秘的影响。

患者与方法

随机选取接受其中一种研究药物治疗的癌症疼痛门诊患者,纳入一项前瞻性、开放标签、对照试验(n = 174)。根据东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)问卷、数字评分量表(NRS)上的选定项目,直接评估活动能力、疼痛和胃肠道症状,并进行统计学分析。

结果

所有组的人口统计学和医学数据具有可比性。仅15%的患者患有便秘。59%的患者服用了规定的泻药。透皮阿片类药物导致无排便期>72小时的发生率显著更高(透皮芬太尼:22%;透皮丁丙诺啡:21%;口服氢吗啡酮:2%;p = 0.003)。21%的患者出现恶心和呕吐。恶心的平均NRS评分(透皮芬太尼:1.3;透皮丁丙诺啡:1.2;口服氢吗啡酮:1.5;p = 0.6)、止吐药的使用情况(透皮芬太尼:42%;透皮丁丙诺啡:33%;口服氢吗啡酮:36%;p = 0.6)和泻药的使用情况(透皮芬太尼:53%;透皮丁丙诺啡:66%;口服氢吗啡酮:61%;p = 0.2)无显著差异,而呕吐评分存在显著差异(透皮芬太尼:16%;透皮丁丙诺啡:13%;口服氢吗啡酮:33%;p = 0.02)。由于长期治疗后明显的耐受性差异,吗啡等效阿片类药物剂量有所不同(mg/d,透皮芬太尼:183;透皮丁丙诺啡:89;口服氢吗啡酮:143;p = 0.001)。

结论

接受阿片类药物治疗的癌症疼痛患者的胃肠道症状由多种因素引起。在胃肠道症状方面,透皮阿片类药物相较于口服缓释氢吗啡酮并无优势。由于长期治疗后阿片类药物耐受性的发生率不同,透皮芬太尼、透皮丁丙诺啡和口服氢吗啡酮的转换率与文献不符。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验