Koh Kwang Kon, Quon Michael J, Han Seung Hwan, Lee Yonghee, Kim Soo Jin, Park Jeong Beom, Shin Eak Kyun
Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Jun;204(2):483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.021. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
Lipophilic and hydrophilic statins have different effects on adiponectin and insulin resistance in experimental studies and different effects on the rate of onset of new diabetes in large scale clinical studies. Therefore, we hypothesized that simvastatin and pravastatin may have differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients.
This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Age, gender, and body mass index were matched. Forty-three patients were given placebo, simvastatin 20mg, or pravastatin 40 mg, respectively once daily for 2 months.
Simvastatin and pravastatin therapy significantly changed lipoprotein levels and improved flow-mediated dilation after 2 months when compared with baseline (P<0.001) or placebo treatment (P<0.001 by ANOVA). Simvastatin therapy significantly increased insulin levels (mean % changes; 127%, P=0.014) and decreased plasma adiponectin levels (10%, P=0.012) and insulin sensitivity as assessed by QUICKI (6%, P=0.007) when compared with baseline. By contrast, pravastatin therapy did not significantly change insulin levels (-3%, P=0.437) but significantly increased plasma adiponectin levels (9%, P=0.011) and insulin sensitivity (6%, P=0.008) when compared with baseline. In addition, these effects of simvastatin were significant when compared with pravastatin (P<0.001 for insulin levels by ANOVA on Ranks, P<0.001 for adiponectin and P=0.001 for QUICKI by ANOVA). When compared with baseline, simvastatin significantly increased plasma leptin levels (35%, P=0.028), but pravastatin did not (1%, P=0.822).
Despite causing comparable changes in lipoprotein and endothelium-dependent dilation, simvastatin and pravastatin therapy had differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients that may be clinically relevant.
在实验研究中,亲脂性他汀类药物和亲水性他汀类药物对脂联素和胰岛素抵抗有不同影响,在大规模临床研究中对新发糖尿病的发生率也有不同影响。因此,我们推测辛伐他汀和普伐他汀在高胆固醇血症患者中可能具有不同的代谢效应。
这是一项随机、单盲、安慰剂对照的平行研究。年龄、性别和体重指数相匹配。43例患者分别每日一次服用安慰剂、20mg辛伐他汀或40mg普伐他汀,持续2个月。
与基线相比(P<0.001)或与安慰剂治疗相比(方差分析P<0.001),辛伐他汀和普伐他汀治疗2个月后显著改变了脂蛋白水平并改善了血流介导的血管舒张。与基线相比,辛伐他汀治疗显著增加了胰岛素水平(平均变化百分比;127%,P=0.014),降低了血浆脂联素水平(10%,P=0.012)以及通过QUICKI评估的胰岛素敏感性(6%,P=0.007)。相比之下,与基线相比,普伐他汀治疗未显著改变胰岛素水平(-3%,P=0.437),但显著增加了血浆脂联素水平(9%,P=0.011)和胰岛素敏感性(6%,P=0.008)。此外,与普伐他汀相比,辛伐他汀的这些效应具有显著性(秩和方差分析胰岛素水平P<0.001,脂联素P<0.001,QUICKI方差分析P=0.001)。与基线相比,辛伐他汀显著增加了血浆瘦素水平(35%,P=0.028),但普伐他汀没有(1%,P=0.822)。
尽管辛伐他汀和普伐他汀治疗在脂蛋白和内皮依赖性舒张方面引起了相当的变化,但它们在高胆固醇血症患者中具有不同的代谢效应,这可能具有临床相关性。