Murphy Deirdre J, MacGregor Honor, Munishankar Bhagya, McLeod Graeme
Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Coombe Women's Hospital & Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Jan;142(1):30-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
To compare the blood loss at elective lower segment caesarean section with administration of oxytocin 5IU bolus versus oxytocin 5IU bolus and oxytocin 30IU infusion and to establish whether a large multi-centre trial is feasible.
Women booked for an elective caesarean section were recruited to a pilot randomised controlled trial and randomised to either oxytocin 5IU bolus and placebo infusion or oxytocin 5IU bolus and oxytocin 30IU infusion. We wished to establish whether the study design was feasible and acceptable and to establish sample size estimates for a definitive multi-centre trial. The outcome measures were total estimated blood loss at caesarean section and in the immediate postpartum period and the need for an additional uterotonic agent.
A total of 115 women were randomised and 110 were suitable for analysis (5 protocol violations). Despite strict exclusion criteria 84% of the target population were considered eligible for study participation and of those approached only 15% declined to participate and 11% delivered prior to the planned date. The total mean estimated blood loss was lower in the oxytocin infusion arm compared to placebo (567 ml versus 624 ml) and fewer women had a major haemorrhage (>1000 ml, 14% versus 17%) or required an additional uterotonic agent (5% versus 11%). A sample size of 1500 in each arm would be required to demonstrate a 3% absolute reduction in major haemorrhage (from baseline 10%) with >80% power.
An additional oxytocin infusion at elective caesarean section may reduce blood loss and warrants evaluation in a large multi-centre trial.
比较择期下段剖宫产术中静脉推注5IU缩宫素与静脉推注5IU缩宫素加静脉输注30IU缩宫素的失血量,并确定进行一项大型多中心试验是否可行。
将计划进行择期剖宫产的妇女纳入一项试点随机对照试验,并随机分为静脉推注5IU缩宫素加安慰剂输注组或静脉推注5IU缩宫素加静脉输注30IU缩宫素组。我们希望确定该研究设计是否可行且可接受,并为一项确定性的多中心试验估计样本量。观察指标为剖宫产术中及产后即刻的估计总失血量以及是否需要额外使用宫缩剂。
共有115名妇女被随机分组,110名适合分析(5例违反方案)。尽管有严格的排除标准,但仍有84%的目标人群被认为符合研究参与条件,在这些被邀请的人群中,只有15%拒绝参与,11%在计划日期前分娩。与安慰剂组相比,缩宫素输注组的总平均估计失血量较低(567毫升对624毫升),发生大出血(>1000毫升)的妇女较少(14%对17%),或需要额外使用宫缩剂的妇女较少(5%对11%)。若要以>80%的检验效能证明大出血(从基线的10%)绝对减少3%,每组需要1500例样本量。
择期剖宫产术中额外静脉输注缩宫素可能减少失血量,值得在一项大型多中心试验中进行评估。