Braga-Silva J, Peruchi F M, Moschen G M, Gehlen D, Padoin A V
Service of Hand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brazil.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Oct;33(5):636-40. doi: 10.1177/1753193408090400.
We compared two surgical techniques for the treatment of scaphoid non-union, namely, using distal radius vascularised bone graft and iliac crest non-vascularised bone graft. Eighty patients with symptomatic scaphoid non-union underwent surgical treatment, including 35 patients treated with distal radius vascularised bone graft and 45 treated by iliac crest non-vascularised bone graft. Patients were assessed objectively by examination of wrist range of motion, grip strength and radiographic findings in the postoperative period after a mean time of 2.8 (1.4) (range 1-5.2) years. Similar functional results were obtained with the two techniques. All cases of non-union in the non-vascularised group obtained consolidation in a mean time of 8.89 (2.26) months and in the vascularised group in a mean time of 7.97 (3.06) months. Three cases of consolidation failure occurred in the vascularised group and were related to technical difficulties.
我们比较了两种治疗舟骨不愈合的手术技术,即采用桡骨远端带血管蒂骨移植和髂嵴非带血管蒂骨移植。80例有症状的舟骨不愈合患者接受了手术治疗,其中35例采用桡骨远端带血管蒂骨移植治疗,45例采用髂嵴非带血管蒂骨移植治疗。术后平均2.8(1.4)年(范围1 - 5.2年),通过检查腕关节活动范围、握力和影像学表现对患者进行客观评估。两种技术获得了相似的功能结果。非带血管蒂组所有不愈合病例平均8.89(2.26)个月实现骨愈合,带血管蒂组平均7.97(3.06)个月实现骨愈合。带血管蒂组发生3例骨愈合失败,与技术困难有关。