Abdel-Hady Hesham, Matter Mohamed, Hammad Ayman, El-Refaay Ahmed, Aly Hany
Neonatal Care Unit, Mansoura University Children's Hospital, Egypt.
Pediatrics. 2008 Nov;122(5):e1086-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1193.
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is frequently used to support preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Little is known about the hemodynamic changes that occur, particularly during the weaning phase when lung compliance has improved and most of the airway pressure can be transmitted to the heart and major blood vessels.
We conducted a prospective study on preterm infants (gestational age <or=32 weeks) with resolving respiratory distress syndrome, who were receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and 21% oxygen. While cycling nasal continuous positive airway pressure, we performed 2-dimensional M-mode and pulsed Doppler echocardiography on all infants during nasal continuous positive airway pressure and 1 hour after being off nasal continuous positive airway pressure.
A total of 25 preterm infant were studied. The use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure significantly decreased right ventricular output (320 +/- 22.7 vs 410.5 +/- 44.1 mL/kg per min); right ventricular end diastolic diameter (6 +/- 0.7 vs 6.4 +/- 0.4 mm), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (11.6 +/- 0.9 vs 13.6 +/- 0.7 mm), left ventricular end systolic diameter (7.1 +/- 0.6 vs 8.3 +/- 0.4 mm), left atrial diameter (6.3 +/- 0.5 vs 8 +/- 0.5 mm), aortic root diameter (6.4 +/- 0.3 vs 6.6 +/- 0.4 mm), superior vena cava flow (70.2 +/- 8.5 vs 91.1 +/- 4 mL/kg per minute), and pulmonary maximum velocity (0.6 +/- 0.1 vs 0.7 +/- 0.1 m/seconds). It significantly increased mean inferior vena cava diameter (4.3 +/- 0.5 vs 3.5 +/- 0.6 mm), whereas nasal continuous positive airway pressure did not influence left ventricular output, aortic maximum velocity, fractional shortening, heart rate, or mean arterial blood pressure. Changes associated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure were similar in infants with (n = 8) and without (n = 17) patent ductus arteriosus.
In infants with resolving respiratory distress syndrome, nasal continuous positive airway pressure can impede systemic and pulmonary venous return, but it does not compromise systemic arterial pressure or heart rate. It is not clear whether the degree of these hemodynamic changes can affect the success of weaning off nasal continuous positive airway pressure.
经鼻持续气道正压通气常用于支持患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿。对于所发生的血流动力学变化了解甚少,尤其是在撤机阶段,此时肺顺应性已改善,大部分气道压力可传导至心脏和主要血管。
我们对患有正在缓解的呼吸窘迫综合征、接受5 cm H₂O经鼻持续气道正压通气和21%氧气的早产儿(胎龄≤32周)进行了一项前瞻性研究。在经鼻持续气道正压通气切换时,我们在所有婴儿经鼻持续气道正压通气期间及撤掉经鼻持续气道正压通气1小时后进行二维M型和脉冲多普勒超声心动图检查。
共研究了25例早产儿。使用经鼻持续气道正压通气显著降低了右心室输出量(320±22.7 vs 410.5±44.1 mL/kg每分钟);右心室舒张末期内径(6±0.7 vs 6.4±0.4 mm)、左心室舒张末期内径(11.6±0.9 vs 13.6±0.7 mm)、左心室收缩末期内径(7.1±0.6 vs 8.3±0.4 mm);左心房内径(6.3±0.5 vs 8±0.5 mm)、主动脉根部内径(6.4±0.3 vs 6.6±0.4 mm)、上腔静脉血流量(70.2±8.5 vs 91.1±4 mL/kg每分钟)以及肺动脉最大流速(0.6±0.1 vs 0.7±0.1 m/秒)。它显著增加了下腔静脉平均内径(4.3±0.5 vs 3.5±0.6 mm),而经鼻持续气道正压通气不影响左心室输出量、主动脉最大流速、缩短分数、心率或平均动脉血压。有(n = 8)和无(n = 17)动脉导管未闭的婴儿中与经鼻持续气道正压通气相关的变化相似。
在患有正在缓解的呼吸窘迫综合征的婴儿中,经鼻持续气道正压通气可阻碍体循环和肺静脉回流,但不影响体循环动脉压或心率。尚不清楚这些血流动力学变化的程度是否会影响撤掉经鼻持续气道正压通气的成功率。