Windom Hugh H, Lockey Richard F
Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;8(6):571-6. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32831845fb.
As allergen sublingual immunotherapy becomes more widely used in Europe and draws the attention of physicians of the USA, it is important to compare and contrast the safety aspects of this therapy versus allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy.
There are reports of severe systemic reactions associated with sublingual immunotherapy, but no fatalities. There are various studies of systemic reactions, including those that result in death, associated with subcutaneous immunotherapy over its nearly 100-year worldwide experience. Local reactions are common to both forms of the treatment.
If both forms of therapy are equally effective, a cost (including safety aspects) -benefit analysis of sublingual immunotherapy versus subcutaneous immunotherapy is necessary to determine how best to incorporate both forms of specific immunotherapy into the management of allergic patients. Adherence to published guidelines will reduce the likelihood of adverse reactions.
随着变应原舌下免疫疗法在欧洲得到更广泛应用并引起美国医生的关注,比较和对比这种疗法与变应原皮下免疫疗法的安全性方面非常重要。
有与舌下免疫疗法相关的严重全身反应报告,但无死亡病例。在全球近100年的皮下免疫疗法应用经验中,有各种关于全身反应的研究,包括导致死亡的反应。两种治疗形式都常见局部反应。
如果两种治疗形式同样有效,那么有必要对舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法进行成本(包括安全性方面)效益分析,以确定如何最好地将两种特异性免疫疗法纳入过敏患者的管理中。遵循已发表的指南将降低不良反应的可能性。