• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种改良的无过错医疗事故制度可以解决医疗系统的多重缺陷。

A modified no-fault malpractice system can resolve multiple healthcare system deficiencies.

作者信息

Segal Jeffrey J, Sacopulos Michael

机构信息

Medical Justice Services, Inc., PO Box 49669, Greensboro, NC 27419, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):420-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0577-9. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-008-0577-9
PMID:18979149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2628501/
Abstract

Medical professional liability in the United States, as measured by total premiums paid by physicians and healthcare facilities, costs approximately $30 billion a year in direct expenses, less than 2% of the entire annual healthcare expenditures. Only a fraction of those dollars reach patients who are negligently injured. Nonetheless, the tort system has far-reaching effects that create substantial indirect costs. Medical malpractice litigation is pervasive and physicians practice defensively to avoid being named in a suit. Those extra expenditures provide little value to patients. Despite an elaborate existing tort system, patient safety remains a vexing problem. Many injured patients are denied access to timely, reasonable remedies. We propose a no-fault system supplemented by a variation of the traditional tort system whereby physicians are incentivized to follow evidence-based guidelines. The proposed system would guarantee a substantial decrease in, but not elimination of, litigation. The system would lower professional liability premiums. Injured patients would ordinarily be compensated with no-fault disability and life insurance proceeds. To the extent individual physicians pose a recurrent danger, their care would be reviewed on an administrative level. Savings would be invested in health information technology and purchase of insurance coverage for the uninsured. We propose a financial model based on publicly accessible sources.

摘要

在美国,以医生和医疗机构支付的总保费衡量,医疗职业责任每年的直接费用约为300亿美元,不到全年医疗总支出的2%。这些钱中只有一小部分给到了因医疗过失而受伤的患者。尽管如此,侵权责任制度仍产生了深远影响,带来了巨大的间接成本。医疗事故诉讼很普遍,医生采取防御性医疗行为以避免被起诉。这些额外支出对患者几乎没有价值。尽管现有的侵权责任制度很完善,但患者安全仍然是一个棘手的问题。许多受伤患者无法获得及时、合理的赔偿。我们提议建立一个无过错制度,并辅以传统侵权责任制度的一种变体,以此激励医生遵循循证指南。提议的制度将保证大幅减少但不会消除诉讼。该制度将降低职业责任保险费。受伤患者通常将通过无过错残疾保险和人寿保险获得赔偿。对于个别反复构成危险的医生,将在行政层面审查其医疗行为。节省下来的资金将投资于健康信息技术,并为未参保者购买保险。我们提议建立一个基于公开可用数据来源的财务模型。

相似文献

1
A modified no-fault malpractice system can resolve multiple healthcare system deficiencies.一种改良的无过错医疗事故制度可以解决医疗系统的多重缺陷。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):420-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0577-9. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
2
How much does defensive medicine cost?防御性医疗的成本是多少?
J Am Health Policy. 1994 Jul-Aug;4(4):7-15.
3
Medical liability, product liability, and the question of tort reform.医疗责任、产品责任与侵权法改革问题。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 Dec;94(12):1039-49.
4
The malpractice liability crisis, part 2: moving toward workable solutions.医疗事故责任危机,第二部分:迈向可行的解决方案。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Apr;1(4):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.12.019.
5
Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?法定上限:是对医疗事故保险危机的非自愿贡献,还是获得可负担医疗保健的合理机制?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993 Spring;9:337-75.
6
Professional liability: epidemiology and demography.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;31(1):148-52.
7
The impact of the medical malpractice crisis on OB-GYNs and patients in southern New Jersey.医疗事故危机对新泽西州南部妇产科医生和患者的影响。
N J Med. 2003 Sep;100(9):12-9.
8
Doctors, damages and deterrence. An economic view of medical malpractice.医生、损害赔偿与威慑:医疗事故的经济学视角
N Engl J Med. 1978 Jun 8;298(23):1282-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197806082982304.
9
Rethinking the Obvious: Time for New Ideas on Medical Malpractice Tort Reform.重新审视显而易见之事:是时候提出医疗事故侵权改革的新想法了。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2019 Apr/Jun;38(2):109-115. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000260.
10
Moving beyond the blame game.超越指责游戏。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2003 Fall;20(1):3-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.医疗事故诉讼中的索赔、失误及赔偿金支付
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):2024-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054479.
2
Motivations for medico-legal action. Lessons from New Zealand.
J Leg Med. 2006 Mar;27(1):55-70. doi: 10.1080/01947640500533317.
3
Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.在不稳定的医疗事故环境中,高风险专科医生的防御性医疗行为。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2609-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2609.
4
Liability for medical malpractice: issues and evidence. A Joint Economic Committee study. Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress.医疗事故责任:问题与证据。美国国会联合经济委员会的一项研究。美国国会联合经济委员会
N J Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;100(7-8):13-9.
5
The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care.医疗保险支出地区差异的影响。第2部分:健康结果与医疗满意度。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00007.
6
The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury.针对轻度头部损伤患者的加拿大头部CT检查规则。
Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1391-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04561-x.