Chauhan Suneet P, Berghella Vincenzo, Sanderson Maureen, Siddiqui Danish, Hendrix Nancy W, Magann Everett F
Aurora Health Care, West Allis, Wisconsin 53227, USA.
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Jan;26(1):69-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1095178. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
We appraised the compliance of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) cited for level A recommendations in obstetric practice bulletins (OPBs) and published after the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, published 1996) statement. From the CONSORT checklist, we identified 50 separate items the RCTs should describe in the article and assigned 1 point if present; 0, if absent. The CONSORT score was the total points, expressed as a percentage. From 1998 to 2006, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published 68 level A obstetric recommendations, and 20 (29%) are supported by > or = 1 RCT published after 1997. The median CONSORT score for the 32 RCTs published after the statement was 73% (range 30 to 100%). Only four RCTs complied with 90% of the CONSORT statement. RCTs supporting level A recommendations in OPB have variable compliance with CONSORT. Recommendations that lack quality RCTs should prompt further studies into the topic.
我们评估了产科实践公告(OPB)中被引用于A级推荐的随机临床试验(RCT)的依从性,这些试验在CONSORT(综合报告试验标准,1996年发布)声明之后发表。根据CONSORT清单,我们确定了RCT在文章中应描述的50个单独项目,若存在则赋值1分;若不存在则赋值0分。CONSORT得分是总分,以百分比表示。1998年至2006年,美国妇产科医师学会发表了68项A级产科推荐,其中20项(29%)得到了1997年后发表的≥1项RCT的支持。声明发布后发表的32项RCT的CONSORT得分中位数为73%(范围30%至100%)。只有四项RCT符合CONSORT声明的90%。支持OPB中A级推荐的RCT对CONSORT的依从性各不相同。缺乏高质量RCT的推荐应促使对该主题进行进一步研究。