Nemecz G, Hubbell T, Jefferson J R, Lowe J B, Schroeder F
Department of Pharmacology and Cell Biophysics, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio 45267-0004.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991 Apr;286(1):300-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90044-j.
Intestinal enterocytes contain two homologous fatty acid-binding proteins, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP)2 and liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP). Since the functional basis for this multiplicity is not known, the fatty acid-binding specificity of recombinant forms of both rat I-FABP and rat L-FABP was examined. A systematic comparative analysis of the 18 carbon chain length fatty acid binding parameters, using both radiolabeled (stearic, oleic, and linoleic) and fluorescent (trans-parinaric and cis-parinaric) fatty acids, was undertaken. Results obtained with a classical Lipidex-1000 binding assay, which requires separation of bound from free fatty acid, were confirmed with a fluorescent fatty acid-binding assay not requiring separation of bound and unbound ligand. Depending on the nature of the fatty acid ligand, I-FABP bound fatty acid had dissociation constants between 0.2 and 3.1 microM and a consistent 1:1 molar ratio. The dissociation constants for L-FABP bound fatty acids ranged between 0.9 and 2.6 microM and the protein bound up to 2 mol fatty acid per mole of protein. Both fatty acid-binding proteins exhibited relatively higher affinity for unsaturated fatty acids as compared to saturated fatty acids of the same chain length. cis-Parinaric acid or trans-parinaric acid (each containing four double bonds) bound to L-FABP and I-FABP were displaced in a competitive manner by non-fluorescent fatty acid. Hill plots of the binding of cis- and trans- parinaric acid to L-FABP showed that the binding affinities of the two sites were very similar and did not exhibit cooperativity. The lack of fluorescence self-quenching upon binding 2 mol of either trans- or cis-parinaric acid/mol L-FABP is consistent with the presence of two binding sites with dissimilar orientation in the L-FABP. Thus, the difference in binding capacity between I-FABP and L-FABP predicts a structurally different binding site or sites.
肠上皮细胞含有两种同源脂肪酸结合蛋白,即肠脂肪酸结合蛋白(I-FABP)和肝脂肪酸结合蛋白(L-FABP)。由于这种多样性的功能基础尚不清楚,因此对大鼠I-FABP和大鼠L-FABP重组形式的脂肪酸结合特异性进行了研究。使用放射性标记的(硬脂酸、油酸和亚油酸)和荧光的(反式-十八碳四烯酸和顺式-十八碳四烯酸)脂肪酸,对18碳链长度脂肪酸结合参数进行了系统的比较分析。通过经典的Lipidex-1000结合试验(该试验需要分离结合脂肪酸和游离脂肪酸)获得的结果,在不需要分离结合配体和未结合配体的荧光脂肪酸结合试验中得到了证实。根据脂肪酸配体性质的不同,I-FABP结合脂肪酸的解离常数在0.2至3.1微摩尔之间,且摩尔比始终为1:1。L-FABP结合脂肪酸的解离常数在0.9至2.6微摩尔之间,每摩尔蛋白质可结合多达2摩尔脂肪酸。与相同链长的饱和脂肪酸相比,这两种脂肪酸结合蛋白对不饱和脂肪酸均表现出相对较高的亲和力。与L-FABP和I-FABP结合的顺式-十八碳四烯酸或反式-十八碳四烯酸(均含四个双键)会被非荧光脂肪酸竞争性取代。顺式和反式-十八碳四烯酸与L-FABP结合的希尔图表明,两个位点的结合亲和力非常相似,且不表现出协同性。每摩尔L-FABP结合2摩尔反式或顺式-十八碳四烯酸时缺乏荧光自猝灭现象,这与L-FABP中存在两个方向不同的结合位点是一致的。因此,I-FABP和L-FABP在结合能力上的差异预示着其结合位点在结构上存在差异。