Jones D R
Aeropsych Associates, San Antonio, TX.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Jul;62(7):624-7.
A review of the literature on the central nervous system (CNS) effects of repeated centrifuge acceleration studies involving G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) reveals that remarkably few adverse effects have been reported, aside from the G-LOC itself, even in subjects with numerous exposures. However, most of the followup studies were performed before the availability of sophisticated neuropsychological tests and non-invasive means of imaging the CNS, such as computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), brain electrical activity measurement (BEAM), and positron emission tomography (PET). Further, only a handful of long-term followup studies have been done. Thus, although repeated G-LOC may have induced some long-term adverse CNS effects, either organic or functional, little has been done to detect them. Even granted that some damage may be done, this risk must be weighed against the risk of aviators of similar damage from high +Gz exposures in flight, and even more against the risk of fatal G-LOC aircraft accidents. Volunteers for centrifuge acceleration studies should be fully informed about what is known and not known in this regard. As an ancillary measure, head restraints may be useful in avoiding postural trauma to the cervical spine, or impact injury to the head when G-LOC occurs and the head snaps forward and down.
一项关于涉及G诱发意识丧失(G-LOC)的反复离心机加速研究对中枢神经系统(CNS)影响的文献综述表明,除了G-LOC本身外,即便在多次接受测试的受试者中,所报告的不良反应也非常少。然而,大多数后续研究是在先进的神经心理学测试和中枢神经系统成像的非侵入性手段(如计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)、脑电活动测量(BEAM)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET))出现之前进行的。此外,仅开展了少数长期随访研究。因此,尽管反复的G-LOC可能已诱发了一些中枢神经系统的长期不良影响,无论是器质性还是功能性的,但几乎没有采取措施来检测它们。即便承认可能会造成一些损害,这种风险也必须与飞行员在飞行中因高+Gz暴露而遭受类似损害的风险进行权衡,更要与致命的G-LOC飞机事故风险进行权衡。应让离心机加速研究的志愿者充分了解这方面已知和未知的情况。作为一项辅助措施,头部约束装置可能有助于避免颈椎的姿势性创伤,或在发生G-LOC且头部向前下方猛甩时避免头部受到撞击伤害。