Loomis Jack M, Kelly Jonathan W, Pusch Matthias, Bailenson Jeremy N, Beall Andrew C
Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660, USA.
Perception. 2008;37(9):1443-57. doi: 10.1068/p5896.
Two psychophysical experiments are reported, one dealing with the visual perception of the head orientation of another person (the 'looker') and the other dealing with the perception of the looker's direction of eye gaze. The participant viewed the looker with different retinal eccentricities, ranging from foveal to far-peripheral viewing. On average, judgments of head orientation were reliable even out to the extremes of peripheral vision (90 degrees eccentricity), with better performance at the extremes when the participant was able to view the looker changing head orientation from one trial to the next. In sharp contrast, judgments of eye-gaze direction were reliable only out to 4 degrees eccentricity, signifying that the eye-gaze social signal is available to people only when they fixate near the looker's eyes. While not unexpected, this vast difference in availability of information about head direction and eye direction, both of which can serve as indicators of the looker's focus of attention, is important for understanding the dynamics of eye-gaze behavior.
本文报告了两项心理物理学实验,一项涉及对他人(“注视者”)头部朝向的视觉感知,另一项涉及对注视者目光方向的感知。参与者以不同的视网膜偏心度观察注视者,范围从中央凹到远周边视觉。平均而言,即使在周边视觉的极端情况下(偏心度为90度),头部朝向的判断也是可靠的,当参与者能够在不同试验中观察到注视者改变头部朝向时,在极端情况下表现会更好。与之形成鲜明对比的是,目光方向的判断仅在偏心度为4度时才可靠,这表明目光社会信号仅在人们注视注视者眼睛附近时才对他们可用。虽然并不意外,但头部方向和眼睛方向信息可用性的巨大差异,这两者都可作为注视者注意力焦点的指标,对于理解目光行为的动态过程很重要。