Levenson H, Greensite F, Hoefs J, Friloux L, Applegate G, Silva E, Kanel G, Buxton R
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange 92668.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Feb;156(2):307-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.2.1898804.
Quantification of hepatic fat content by application of MR phase-contrast imaging (Dixon method) at 1.5 T was compared with results of biopsy in 16 patients with a variety of liver abnormalities. Motion artifact was suppressed by employing six or eight averages of short TR in-phase (echo offset, 0 msec), out-of-phase (echo offset, 1.1 msec), and in-phase (echo offset, 2.2 msec) spin-echo pulse sequences. The 360 degree out-of-phase sequence was used to assess the impact of T2* decay on this method of estimating fat fraction. A standard two-echo long TR sequence also was obtained in all patients. Histologic preparations from the biopsy specimens were examined by a pathologist who had no knowledge of the MR results and were graded according to overall visual assessment as belonging to one of four categories of fat fraction. Results of the MR-calculated apparent fat fraction were compared directly with biopsy category and were also placed in MR fat fraction categories, allowing estimation of the statistical correlation between the biopsy and MR grading systems. Eight of eight patients with biopsy categories indicating a fat fraction of less than 0.25 were computed by MR to have a fat fraction of less than 0.1. Seven of eight patients with biopsy categories indicating a fat fraction of greater than 0.25 were computed by MR to have a fat fraction of at least 0.24. The MR-calculated apparent fat fraction category correlated significantly with the histologic biopsy category (r = .86, p less than .01). When compared with the in-phase image, decreased signal from liver was visually apparent on the 180 degree out-of-phase images in all cases in which the fat fraction was at least 0.24, but there was no indication of fatty liver on the standard T1- or T2-weighted images. Calculated T2 also showed no correlation with degree of fatty deposition. Correction for T2* decay by using the 360 degree out-of-phase acquisition in addition to the standard 0 degree and 180 degree out-of-phase images had little effect on fat fraction computation. Phase-contrast MR is a promising noninvasive method for quantitative assessment of fatty deposition in the liver.
对16例患有各种肝脏异常的患者,应用1.5T磁共振相位对比成像(狄克逊法)对肝脏脂肪含量进行定量分析,并与活检结果进行比较。通过对短TR同相位(回波偏移,0毫秒)、反相位(回波偏移,1.1毫秒)和同相位(回波偏移,2.2毫秒)自旋回波脉冲序列采用6次或8次平均采集来抑制运动伪影。采用360度反相位序列评估T2衰减对这种估计脂肪分数方法的影响。所有患者均获取标准的双回波长TR序列。活检标本的组织学切片由一位对磁共振结果不知情的病理学家进行检查,并根据总体视觉评估分为脂肪分数的四类之一进行分级。将磁共振计算得到的表观脂肪分数结果直接与活检类别进行比较,并将其也归入磁共振脂肪分数类别,从而估计活检和磁共振分级系统之间的统计相关性。活检类别显示脂肪分数小于0.25的8例患者中,磁共振计算得出的脂肪分数均小于0.1。活检类别显示脂肪分数大于0.25的8例患者中,磁共振计算得出的脂肪分数至少为0.24的有7例。磁共振计算得出的表观脂肪分数类别与组织学活检类别显著相关(r = 0.86, p < 0.01)。与同相位图像相比,在所有脂肪分数至少为0.24的病例中,180度反相位图像上肝脏信号明显降低,但标准T1加权或T2加权图像上均未显示脂肪肝迹象。计算得到的T2也与脂肪沉积程度无关。除标准的0度和180度反相位图像外,使用360度反相位采集对T2衰减进行校正,对脂肪分数计算影响不大。相位对比磁共振成像对于肝脏脂肪沉积的定量评估是一种很有前景的非侵入性方法。